Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 2 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 3 | TOWNSHEND Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 5 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 6 | ARZT Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% | 6% |
| 7 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 8 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
| 9 | AYOTTE James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 31% | |
| 10 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 11 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 12 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 13 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 14 | DILDA Griffin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 15% |
| 15 | RAMEY Daylon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | GUO Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | ZHANG Kwan Fei(Albert) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 18 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 12% | |
| 19 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
| 20 | WANG Eason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
| 22 | BORAN Brooks | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 24 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
| 25 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 13% |
| 26 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 28 | NG Nico | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% |
| 29 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 30 | SAAD Peter | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
| 32 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 33 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 35 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 36 | HERDMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 37 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 37 | LOPATIN Sergei | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | BENNETT Pierce | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | TSEN Mason | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | BENUCCI Vincent | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 43 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 44 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
| 45 | KELLY Blair | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LEE Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 47 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 48 | SCORDINSKY Liam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 49 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 50 | ALPSOY Emir | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | KHAW-BRIOT Julien | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | JANKOVIC Ivan | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | PERI Mourya | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | YU Jeremy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | WILKERSON Tobias | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 57 | URIA Sullivan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 58 | HUDSON Declan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 60 | BAYUS Oliver | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 61 | CHONG Eden | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 99% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 63 | OZBAY Alp | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 64 | MCCABE Kian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 65 | KUBBA Sauvil | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | SAAD Noah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 67 | SALLAI Abel | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | FEELY Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 69 | WEI Jayden | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | PARY Jean Pierre | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 71 | PETROVSKI Kiril | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | DAVIS Kai | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 74 | GALIOTE James | 100% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | MASSIE Jay | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 76 | BROSNAN Solomon | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 77 | QI Bryan | 100% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | PRABHU Srinish | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 79 | SACKETT Gavin | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 81 | STUKALO Egor | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | SCOTTODIMARCO James | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 83 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | MILLER Balthazar | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | CHOI Joshua | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 88 | BATISTA Julian | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 89 | CHIU Preston | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.