October NAC

Cadet Men's Épée

Monday, October 15, 2018 at 1:00 PM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 NGUYEN Ethan D. - 1% 5% 18% 36% 31% 10%
2 VINNITCHOUK Ted - - 1% 5% 21% 43% 31%
3 SHIFRON Daniel A. - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
3 ZHAO Howard - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
5 LAWSON Nicholas W. - 1% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
6 MA Ark - 3% 13% 30% 35% 17% 2%
7 WEISS Miles J. - 1% 6% 21% 37% 29% 6%
8 BODON Michele I. - 1% 7% 24% 37% 26% 6%
9 LIVERANT Skyler J. - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
10 GAIDAR Daniel B. - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
11 CHA Russell W. - - 1% 9% 28% 40% 22%
12 LI Jason Man Kit - 4% 15% 31% 32% 15% 3%
13 MILAM Hugh - 2% 15% 37% 34% 11% 1%
14 BRUNET Nathan 3% 26% 40% 24% 7% 1% -
15 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. 1% 4% 16% 29% 30% 16% 3%
16 WANG Nathan - 1% 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
17 GORNOVSKY David J. - - 1% 11% 36% 40% 12%
18 HADDAD Justin R. - - 3% 14% 34% 36% 13%
19 LEI Joshua - 4% 20% 39% 30% 6%
20 SHUGART Henry R. - 4% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
21 ROBINSON Riley - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
22 NIEBERGALL Colin G. - 1% 4% 16% 33% 34% 13%
23 KIM Ethan S. 3% 18% 35% 29% 12% 2% -
24 DEGUCHI Nicolas - 2% 13% 35% 36% 13% 1%
25 ANDROSYUK Alexander 4% 18% 32% 29% 14% 3% -
26 KOZLOWSKI Matthew K. 7% 26% 36% 24% 7% 1% -
26 YAN yuheng - - 4% 16% 33% 33% 13%
28 RUSSANOV Boris J. 6% 24% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
29 DAO Matthew M. 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
30 XIAN Riley - 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
31 REID Avo - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3%
32 ZHANG Eric - 4% 20% 37% 29% 10% 1%
33 KUMASHI Mihir R. - - 1% 11% 38% 44% 6%
34 KUSHNERIK Ethan - 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4%
35 MALIASSOV Nikita S. - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
36 LEE Ryan - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
37 KAMBESELES Peter G. - - 3% 14% 34% 36% 13%
38 LEIGH David A. - - - 3% 15% 40% 42%
39 LEI Jacob - 3% 15% 33% 34% 14% 1%
40 MOOSEKIAN Stafford 1% 14% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
41 SHINE Peter C. - - 1% 6% 21% 41% 32%
42 IYOKI Kent - - - 4% 17% 41% 38%
43 LEE Timothy S. - - 1% 6% 24% 43% 26%
44 SPIER Julian H. - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
45 LIU Alexander - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
46 VERMEULE Spencer 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
47 KANG Michael H. - 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1%
48 SHIN Joshua - - 3% 12% 31% 37% 17%
49 JIA Chengming J. 11% 34% 35% 16% 4% - -
50 LEVY Zachari I. - - 1% 7% 24% 42% 26%
50 TOPAZ Nicholas 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
52 GUI Runlin - 11% 34% 36% 15% 3% -
53 KIM Juni C. - - 4% 18% 42% 36%
54 ZHU Wilson - 2% 15% 41% 34% 8%
55 RA Jr. Daniel M. - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 24%
56 XU Zitong (Evan) 19% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
57 MALYSZ Anthony J. - 1% 6% 24% 40% 25% 5%
58 INSLER Gabriel C. - 1% 6% 19% 34% 30% 10%
59 MU Lejia 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
60 SHARMA Sanil 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
61 LENDER David 1% 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
62 TAE William G. 3% 15% 32% 31% 15% 4% -
63 FEINBERG Gabriel M. 25% 43% 25% 6% 1% -
64 HANXU Richard A. 15% 35% 32% 14% 3% - -
65 KAMBESELES Jack M. - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
66 ZHENG Hagen - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 7%
67 WOZNIAK David - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
68 DOLGONOS Mark - 1% 7% 25% 41% 23% 4%
70 XIAN Ryan - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
71 JAYENDRA Chandrashekar - 4% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
72 ZAFFT Maximo S. - - 2% 12% 32% 37% 16%
72 LI Brian X 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
74 LEE Aaron Y. 1% 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% -
75 SHENG Patrick Y. 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 10% 1%
75 LESPERANCE Lucas 7% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
77 SILVERS Noah E. - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 28%
78 JOVANOVIC Jovan - 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
79 SZABO Benedek H. 2% 12% 26% 31% 21% 7% 1%
80 KELSEY Ryan - 2% 12% 30% 35% 18% 3%
81 MUN Michael K. 1% 6% 20% 34% 28% 10% 1%
82 ROY Joseph T. - 1% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
83 JEONG Connor 15% 37% 33% 12% 2% - -
84 VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
85 SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. 1% 9% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
86 MIRANDA Matteo - 7% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
87 KASTENBERG Leo M. 4% 20% 33% 28% 12% 3% -
88 TIAN Kevin 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% 1%
89 ANDERSON Elias W. - 4% 18% 35% 31% 12% 1%
90 PADHYE Siddhant 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
91 MARAKOV Allen B. - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
92 ATANAS Matthew M. 10% 30% 34% 19% 6% 1% -
93 YOON Nathan 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
94 KEHOE James E. 13% 42% 32% 11% 2% - -
95 HUGHES Levi H. 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
96 SZABO Domonkos 2% 11% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
97 GIBSON Nowell L. - 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
98 KIM Minjun 13% 33% 33% 16% 4% - -
99 BEKKER Mitchel - - 5% 21% 40% 29% 5%
100 WHELAN Thomas (Tony) 1% 11% 31% 35% 17% 3% -
101 PIEKARSKI John P. - 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
102 JUSCINSKI Michal 33% 42% 20% 5% - - -
103 LEVITT Nicholas M. - 1% 8% 28% 38% 21% 4%
104 LIM Timothy D. 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
105 KRONROD Tal - - 4% 16% 33% 34% 13%
106 CARVALHO Daniel S. - 1% 8% 28% 42% 18% 2%
107 KIM Ethan J. 4% 19% 33% 28% 12% 3% -
107 GLECKNER Aidan 5% 22% 34% 26% 11% 2% -
109 LEE Wesley Y. 9% 37% 37% 14% 2% - -
110 LIU Zachary 15% 34% 32% 15% 4% - -
111 BORATIN Daniel I. 2% 18% 37% 29% 11% 2% -
112 BALAJI Tharoon N. 3% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3% -
113 SHOURIE Jai 1% 9% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
114 DEO Ameya 15% 48% 30% 7% 1% - -
115 YAO Michael 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% -
116 RAWSON Nicholas 6% 27% 42% 21% 3% -
117 KOKENGE Clark 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
118 LIANG Aaron 3% 17% 34% 30% 13% 3% -
119 SHAH Maximilian A. 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% -
120 MCDERMOTT Brian 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 9% 1%
121 IVAKIMOV Vasil 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
122 ALAIMO Charles - 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 1%
123 CAPELLUA Tommaso 17% 37% 31% 12% 2% - -
124 PARKER Riley D. 17% 40% 32% 10% 1% - -
126 MIELE Benjamin - 3% 14% 30% 33% 16% 2%
126 PAK Charles 18% 37% 30% 12% 3% - -
128 BRENNAN Charles F. 2% 15% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
129 UKOLOV Dimitri 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
130 DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
130 HU Matthew 16% 35% 31% 14% 3% - -
130 ZHANG zhiyin 4% 23% 41% 25% 6% 1% -
133 MOSES Alexander 9% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
134 BYNAGARI Niketh 29% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
135 JOO Benjamin 77% 21% 2% - - - -
136 INSLER Ethan C. - 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
137 FRANCO-TENTIOUK Christopher J. 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% - -
138 HOWELL Thomas A. 3% 25% 38% 24% 8% 1% -
139 MAAS Sean H. 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
140 SJOSTEDT Jacob H. 1% 11% 36% 42% 9% 1% -
141 SHUR Yakov C. < 1% 2% 13% 34% 36% 13% 1%
142 SMITH Nicholas S. 41% 47% 11% 1% - - -
143 OH Matthew M. 1% 6% 22% 35% 26% 8% 1%
144 WISNIEWSKI Bart 75% 23% 3% - - - -
145 XIANG HONGYI 9% 32% 38% 18% 3% - -
146 WONG Joshua 19% 42% 30% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.