March NAC

Y-12 Men's Foil

Sunday, March 8, 2026 at 2:00 PM

Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 WANG Mendy 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 61%
2 PARK Andrew 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 55%
3 ZHAO Nathan 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 71%
3 WANG Tiger 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56%
5 HUYNH Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 50%
6 ZHAI Derrick 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 55%
6 ZHONG Tian 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 50%
8 LYU Brandon 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 44%
9 LI Aaron 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 8%
10 SONG Enoch 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 22%
11 XIAN kevin 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 75%
12 RAU Shogun 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 38%
12 VENAFRO Tristan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 15%
14 ZHONG Yi 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 41%
15 XU Terrance 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 73% 21%
16 TIMBOL Elijah 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 45%
17 LIM EUNSEONG 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 74%
18 PARK Kaiden 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 21%
19 LI Yunze 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 31% 6%
20 XU Ethan 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 17%
21 FAN Ze Lin 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
22 ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 32%
23 ZHONG Kingsley 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 14%
23 RYU Dae Hyeon 100% 100% 98% 89% 63% 27% 5%
25 ROPER Griffin 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 43% 8%
26 TAO Jiemi 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 71% 19%
27 SUAREZ Lucas 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 12%
28 TAN Charlie 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 27%
29 WANG Mingcheng 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 34% 6%
30 ZHANG Aiden 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 37% 4%
31 GUGALA Frank 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2%
32 CAO Aaron 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 27% 3%
33 PARK Gi Beom 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 56%
34 CHANG Parker 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
34 WU Wallace 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 49%
36 DANTON Ryan 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 44% 9%
37 SUN Lucas 100% 100% 98% 84% 52% 17% 2%
38 YANG Steve 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 73% 28%
39 TAN Alan 100% 99% 93% 70% 32% 6%
40 CAO Joshua 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 22%
40 LI Ryan 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 26%
42 PARK Avan 100% 100% 99% 95% 79% 47% 13%
43 QU Richard 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 37%
43 LIN Lucas 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 52% 12%
45 ZHANG William 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 25% 3%
46 TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 15%
46 ZHAI Alex 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 33%
48 DHALIWAL Zorawar Singh 100% 99% 94% 72% 35% 8% 1%
49 XIE Jayden 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 25%
50 EVANS Desmond 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 49%
51 SUN Roy 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 34%
52 LEE Ryan 100% 100% 96% 76% 40% 11% 1%
53 LIU Alex 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 62%
54 LIN George 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 11% 1%
55 JIN George 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 21%
56 MCCOOL Henry 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36% 4%
57 TURBAT Travis 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 17% 2%
58 CHEN Steven 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 11%
59 CHAU Ivan 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 10% 1%
60 YANG Luca 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 17% 2%
60 HUDSON Jedidiah 100% 99% 90% 62% 23% 4% -
62 CHEN Keegan 100% 100% 98% 85% 46% 9% 1%
63 WU Gengze (Daniel) 100% 100% 99% 88% 55% 16% 1%
64 SHARMA Ari 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 12% 1%
65 WANG Jaaziel 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 23% 4%
66 SHOU Raymond 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 52%
67 CHEN Dante 100% 98% 87% 58% 26% 6% 1%
68 ROSOWSKY Phoenix 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 11% 1%
68 TIKHONOV Aleksandr 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
70 WANG Eason 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 15% 2%
71 KIAYIAS Anthony 100% 100% 96% 73% 32% 3%
72 SINGH Reyaansh 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 18% 2%
73 ZHENG Lerui 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 60% 14%
73 WU David 100% 99% 85% 50% 17% 3% -
75 ZHANG Eric 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 28% 3%
76 TIAN Andy 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 9%
76 PAN Howard Haoran 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 23%
78 ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 37% 5%
79 MORALES Tycho 100% 99% 85% 45% 10% 1%
80 SHEN Lucas 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 9% 1%
81 FOO Kingston 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 18% 2%
82 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 36% 5%
82 YU Ethan 100% 99% 94% 72% 37% 11% 1%
84 DING Sam 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 18% 2%
85 MAZAHERI John 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 3%
86 YOON Mason 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 16% 2%
87 TARDIFF Owen 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
88 WILLIAMS Thomas 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
89 HO Kasper 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
90 CORAN Roland 100% 99% 86% 53% 18% 2%
91 HUANG Dalynn 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 22%
92 DESERANNO Leander 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 68%
93 BRADY David 100% 99% 86% 54% 20% 4% -
94 ZHAO David 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 26% 5%
94 MADDES Gage 100% 99% 94% 74% 41% 12% 1%
96 HUYNH Kaleb 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 8%
97 YAN Aaron 100% 98% 85% 54% 20% 3% -
98 JIN Yucheng 100% 100% 93% 65% 24% 2%
99 LI Andrew 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 26% 2%
100 PARK Joshua 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 10%
101 LIU Bradley 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 22% 3%
102 CREMEL Remi 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 1%
103 WILSON Jacob 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 22% 4%
104 JIANG Ethan 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4% -
105 FANG Lionel 100% 98% 87% 58% 25% 6% 1%
106 QIAN Henry 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 38% 9%
107 HYUN Francis 100% 96% 75% 36% 8% 1% -
107 BUCHNER Roland 100% 98% 71% 28% 5% -
109 BAGWELL Theodore 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% - -
110 JIANG Justin 100% 98% 84% 55% 22% 5% -
111 MENG Andy 100% 99% 92% 65% 27% 5% -
112 KIM ISAAC 100% 85% 48% 14% 2% - -
113 MENG Eric 100% 91% 58% 20% 3% - -
114 HAN Jayden 100% 98% 82% 47% 15% 2% -
115 HUA Isaac 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 7% -
116 HUANG Lucas 100% 100% 94% 71% 32% 6% -
117 MURDOCK Koichi 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 15%
118 KANAN Noland 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 19% 2%
119 WU Yulen 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 12% 1%
120 GOLDSTEIN Tate 100% 90% 57% 21% 4% - -
121 PU Yikun 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 4% -
122 COOK Owen 100% 78% 38% 10% 1% - -
123 CHONG Cooper 100% 99% 86% 51% 17% 2% -
124 XU Benjamin 100% 86% 47% 13% 2% - -
125 YIN Andrew 100% 95% 67% 29% 7% 1% -
126 SU Sean 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
127 LI Eric 100% 95% 66% 26% 5% - -
129 MAZAHERI Theodore 100% 97% 80% 47% 16% 3% -
130 CHEN Andrew 100% 89% 56% 20% 4% - -
131 SLAIN Owen 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 16%
132 GU Evan 100% 95% 73% 39% 12% 2% -
133 MOON Nolan 100% 99% 86% 47% 11% 1%
134 KAJITA Grayson 100% 93% 63% 25% 5% -
135 TEOH Liam 100% 100% 97% 78% 35% 5% -
136 SU Aiden 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 10% 1%
137 LALONDE Oscar 100% 95% 69% 30% 6% 1% -
138 WU Connor 100% 98% 77% 38% 10% 1% -
139 JAZWINSKI Archer 100% 86% 46% 14% 2% - -
140 CHEN Kyler 100% 100% 96% 78% 39% 7% -
141 LIN Dylan 100% 97% 79% 44% 13% 2% -
142 XU Jason 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 8% 1%
143 KUTATELADZE Danieli 100% 97% 78% 39% 9% 1% -
144 BHOOMI Abhiram 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% -
145 TEPLOV Samuel 100% 80% 40% 11% 1% -
146 SHENOY sean 100% 99% 93% 66% 26% 4% -
147 HOFFMAN Zane 100% 99% 78% 36% 7% -
148 PARK Nathan 100% 98% 84% 47% 12% 1% -
149 LU Ethan 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 9% 1%
151 MARVEL Elliot 100% 67% 25% 5% - - -
152 FUNG Lucas 100% 85% 41% 9% 1% - -
153 JUE Lucas 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% 1%
154 AMR HOSSNY Adam 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 7% -
154 D'MELLO Isaac 100% 90% 59% 23% 5% - -
156 DONG YIKUN 100% 91% 61% 25% 5% - -
157 MOORE Quinn 100% 93% 65% 26% 5% - -
157 MATIYASH Andrew 100% 79% 37% 9% 1% - -
159 MA Madrid 100% 92% 61% 23% 4% - -
160 LAM Lazarus 100% 98% 82% 47% 16% 2% -
161 CHOPEY Oliver 100% 84% 47% 15% 3% - -
162 KOSCIK-AQUINO Nicholas 100% 97% 78% 40% 11% 1% -
163 HOLLANDER Max 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 9% 1%
164 LEE Ryan 100% 96% 72% 31% 6% - -
165 XU Daniel 100% 97% 80% 47% 17% 3% -
166 XIA Wenhao 100% 99% 88% 58% 22% 4% -
166 LIU Max 100% 72% 29% 6% 1% - -
168 LIM Cayden 100% 88% 52% 17% 3% - -
169 ZENG Cayden 100% 84% 39% 8% 1% -
170 CHANG Joshua 100% 91% 57% 19% 3% - -
171 ZHENG Jayden 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
171 LU Jason 100% 73% 32% 7% 1% - -
171 BIGELOW Francis 100% 77% 32% 6% 1% - -
174 GENG Vincent 100% 96% 75% 37% 9% 1%
175 YU Oliver 100% 96% 77% 41% 12% 1%
176 KIM JOSHUA 100% 87% 43% 11% 1% - -
177 NGUYEN Norris 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5% -
178 LEE Thomas 100% 79% 36% 8% 1% - -
179 PECK Henrik 100% 53% 12% 1% - -
180 LI Jonathan 100% 82% 42% 11% 2% - -
181 CHUNG Royce 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
181 TAN benjamin 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1% -
181 NETESA Lukian 100% 47% 10% 1% - - -
184 LIU Mason 100% 95% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
185 ZHANG alex 100% 90% 57% 21% 4% - -
186 WU KADEN 100% 96% 71% 27% 4% - -
187 LI Ethan 100% 76% 33% 7% 1% - -
188 LI Mason 100% 99% 92% 64% 27% 6% 1%
189 XUAN nathan 100% 82% 42% 11% 1% - -
190 GUTKOVSKIY Ryan 100% 92% 65% 31% 8% 1% -
191 MOSAMEH Faraj 100% 85% 46% 14% 2% - -
192 BROWN Rhys 100% 84% 45% 12% 1% - -
192 ZUIDEMA Harrison 100% 78% 37% 10% 1% - -
194 LEE Reiden 100% 68% 26% 5% - - -
195 ZHANG Bryant 100% 83% 42% 11% 1% - -
196 CONTRAMAESTRE VASQUEZ Angel 100% 97% 80% 41% 9% 1% -
197 WU Max 100% 99% 87% 55% 20% 3% -
198 WANG Justin 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% - -
198 CORCOS Joseph-Georges 100% 94% 72% 37% 11% 1% -
200 JAGANNATHAN Avi 100% 74% 32% 7% 1% - -
201 LI Kelson 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 15% 1%
202 HOFFMAN Sacha 100% 91% 60% 24% 5% - -
202 STABROWSKI Joaquin 100% 92% 62% 23% 5% - -
204 CHEN Kyle 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3% -
205 ORIGER John 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% - -
205 LAUX Carter 100% 66% 24% 5% 1% - -
207 GOLDSMID Owen 100% 86% 50% 16% 3% - -
208 CHUNG Lucas 100% 80% 39% 10% 1% - -
209 SUN Zedong Eric 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2% -
210 DING Jacob 100% 85% 48% 15% 2% - -
210 CHEN Zhi-yang 100% 97% 79% 41% 10% 1% -
210 KHANDAN MILAN 100% 59% 17% 2% - - -
213 YUAN Vincent 100% 72% 30% 7% 1% - -
213 WU Kangdi 100% 50% 12% 2% - - -
215 LIN Alexander 100% 90% 58% 23% 4% - -
215 MAN Dylan 100% 94% 70% 33% 9% 1% -
217 KLINE Benjamin 100% 74% 32% 8% 1% - -
217 GUTH Samuel 100% 75% 31% 6% 1% - -
217 NG Harry 100% 88% 54% 20% 4% - -
217 KERR Maxwell 100% 94% 70% 35% 10% 1% -
217 ZHANG Bryson 100% 96% 74% 36% 9% 1% -
222 FUNG Caleb 100% 61% 19% 3% - -
223 LIU Kingston 100% 21% 2% - - -
224 SAKLESHPUR Shashwat 100% 91% 62% 26% 6% 1% -
225 ZHANG Andrew 100% 67% 26% 6% 1% - -
226 KIM Noah 100% 21% 2% - - - -
227 SALMI-BYDALEK Finn 100% 46% 10% 1% - - -
228 HWANG Samuel 100% 52% 12% 1% - - -
229 VALERI Ryan 100% 40% 7% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.