Cherry Blossom 2026 - D1A/VET

Div I-A Men's Épée

Sunday, March 15, 2026 at 9:00 AM

University of Maryland Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KOKENGE Reid V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.5 6 +0.5
2 TIKHONOV Daniel V V V D V V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
3 HILBERT Gabriel E. V V D V V D V V V V V D 5.6 4 -1.6
3 LE BORGNE Matthieu V D V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
5 LEE Aiden V V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
6 CLICK Tristan V V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
7 TIKHONOV Ilia V D V V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
8 TABLEMAN Doug S. D V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
9 CLICK Aiden V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
10 SU Caleb V V V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
11 CHANEY Charles D V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
12 CHENH Justin D V V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
13 ROSE-JONES Simon D V V V V D V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
14 SAUNIER Cameron D V V D V V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
15 PENG Yue V V D D V D V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
16 KONG Brandon D D D D D V V V D 1.9 0 -1.9
17 BORATGIS Christopher J. V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
18 HU Robert J. V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
18 ZIEGLER John V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
20 MILINKOVIC Maksim V V D V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
21 LEE Anton V V V D V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
22 SHREM Samuel G. D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
23 MODANLOU Navid V V V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
24 TUCKER ALFONSO Javier D V V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
25 CHEN Brian V V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
26 YANG Gary V V D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
27 HEARNE Gavin D V V V V D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
28 LEE Aiden V D V V V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
29 TATE William Isom V D V V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
30 GLOGOWSKI Konrad V D D V V D V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
31 HALE Bradley D D V V D D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
32 MARINI Davide D D V D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
33 CHRISTY Peter C. V V V V D V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
34 CUTHBERTSON Dax D V V V V V V D 1.2 5 +3.8
35 FEELY Benjamin V V V V D V V D 1.9 5 +3.1
36 MIKHAIL Lucas D D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
37 MUMMIDI Rishi V D V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
38 ALI Farhan V D V V V D V D 4.7 4 -0.7
38 CHEN Jayden D D V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
40 TIRRELL Justin J. D V V V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
41 MEHROTRA Neel V D D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
41 LEE DoWon V D D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
43 EVANS George V D D V V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
44 BAYUS Oliver V V V D D V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
45 YU Jason V V V V D D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
46 BROSNAN Solomon D V V V D V V D 0.7 4 +3.3
47 ALEXANDER Jacksen V D V V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
48 DOLBOW Trevor V V V D D D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
49 EDGECOMB Michael J. V V V D D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
50 CAMPBELL Daniel R. V D D V D V V D 5.5 3 -2.5
50 DELONG Joshua D D V D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
52 KE Sebastian D V V V D D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
53 LIN Haley V D D V V D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
54 ZHU Yiming D D D V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
55 BORAN Brooks V D V V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
55 WANG Marcus V D V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
57 SO Lorenzo V D D D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
58 PAN Colin D V D V D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
59 BAGHA Armin D V V D V D V D 4.6 3 -1.6
60 ZHAI Junqi V D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
61 SWENSON Keane J. V D V D D V D 3.8 2 -1.8
62 MAGUIRE Timothy D V D V D V D 0.5 2 +1.5
63 CHAN Ian D D D D V V V D 0.6 2 +1.4
64 SUBRAMANIAM Sahil V D D D D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
65 PEPPLE Derek V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
66 WOLFE Alex V D D V V V 5.0 4 -1.0
67 ARMSTRONG TyLee V V D D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
68 WILKERSON Tobias D V V V D V D 1.1 4 +2.9
69 LEECH Braedan D V V V V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
70 SMITH Troy H. V V D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
71 KIM Gene D V V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
72 RAMEY Daylon V D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
73 LEE Benjamin D V V V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
74 AYOTTE James V V V D D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
75 XIE Brandon V D D V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
76 FOLEY Max D V V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
77 ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas D D D V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
78 HUTZ Michael B. V D D D V V 3.5 3 -0.5
78 YU Austin D V V D D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
80 EVANS Allen L. D D V V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
81 RODACHY Jeffrey M. V V D D V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
82 COFFEY Jacob D D V V V D D 3.5 3 -0.5
83 PRAKASH Rahul V D D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
84 KONG Ethan D V D D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
85 BEREKNYEI Lukas V D V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
86 ALPSOY Emir D D D V V D 0.8 2 +1.2
87 STRAFFORD Andrew D V D D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
88 HAN Sam D V D V D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
89 DILDA Griffin V D D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
90 STEVENS Daniel L. D V D D V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
90 SAAD Noah V V D D D D D 0.8 2 +1.2
92 GUO Benjamin D V V D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
93 PERI Mourya D V D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
94 CARNALL Hunter D V D D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
95 LAWLOR Lee V D D V D D D 3.9 2 -1.9
96 SHILOV Maxim V D D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
96 SAAD Peter D D D V V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
98 VELLALA Avinash V V D D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
99 GALEOTTI Loriano D V D D V D D 4.5 2 -2.5
100 KLINE R. Jay D D V D D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
101 BROADBELT Kirk D D D V V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
102 ROBERTS Phoenix D D D D V D D 3.0 1 -2.0
103 WATERS Nathaniel D V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
104 KOKENGE Chad V D D D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
105 LIN Yufei D D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
106 MEDISETTI Arjun D D D D V D D 0.6 1 +0.4
107 PARY Jean Pierre D D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
108 LOPATIN Sergei D V D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
109 QU RuiTing V D D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
110 KING Patrick D V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
111 PETERSON Christopher D D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
112 CARTER Austin L. V D D D D D D 4.4 1 -3.4
113 KUBBA Sauvil D D D D D V D 0.2 1 +0.8
114 JARRATT Isaac D V D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
115 FERRELL Parker V D D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
116 RUSSELL Tallis V D D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
117 STOUT Zachary D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
118 CANDELARIA Armando D D D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
119 MCCABE Kian D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
120 HUGHES Michael D. D D D D D D D 3.3 0 -3.3
121 ADAMS Zachary J. D D D D D D D 2.4 0 -2.4
122 SHELLY Emery D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
123 JIN Adam D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
124 FENG Xinmin D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.