Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 2 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 3 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 3 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 5 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
| 6 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 7 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% |
| 8 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 9 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 10 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 11 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 12 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 38% |
| 13 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 15 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 16 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 10% |
| 17 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 18 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 19 | MIN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 35% |
| 20 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% |
| 21 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 22 | BECKFORD Gavin "Bailey" | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | HUTH Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 35% |
| 24 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 16% |
| 25 | WU Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 26 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 27 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 28 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 29 | CHO Ethan H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 1% |
| 30 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 31 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 32 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 33 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 34 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | 3% |
| 34 | XIAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 36 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 35% |
| 37 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 13% |
| 38 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 39 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
| 40 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 41 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 1% |
| 42 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 43 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 12% |
| 44 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 45 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 46 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 2% |
| 47 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
| 48 | AROUH Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 49 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
| 50 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 11% |
| 50 | HONG David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 52 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 54 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 55 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 56 | KIM Harrison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
| 57 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 58 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 59 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 60 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | 1% |
| 61 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 62 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 63 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 64 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 65 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | LIU William | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 68 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 69 | FINDLAY Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 70 | ZHANG Alex | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 71 | STRINGFELLOW Cameron C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 71 | COPELAND Nigel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 73 | VENKATESH Valen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 7% |
| 74 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 74 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 76 | GERRISH William | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 77 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 78 | ALVAREZ ADRIAN ALEJANDRO | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 79 | DING SHENGLANG | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 80 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | ASHJIAN Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 82 | SONG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 83 | HO CHRISTIAN S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 84 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 85 | BROWNING Michael | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | PALACIOS Francisco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 2% |
| 86 | ANTONUCCI Suren | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 88 | VEDRE-KYANAM KABIR BAIG Aaradhya | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 89 | LIEW Harrison C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 90 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 91 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 92 | BARCA Bryant | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 93 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 94 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 82% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 96 | WANG Rui Qin | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 97 | RIOS Lucas | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 99 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 99 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 101 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 103 | HARRELL Charles | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 104 | CHAKY Theo | 100% | 81% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | ZHU Brandan | 100% | 83% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 106 | TAI Justin | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 109 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 110 | TAI Ethan | 100% | 86% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | FECHTNER Ezra M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 112 | SHEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 113 | SHEHORN Connor | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 114 | KOE Beckett | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | 3% | - |
| 114 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 116 | HONG Logan | 100% | 90% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 117 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 118 | PERSINGER Charles B. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 119 | GARDNER Evan G. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 120 | JONES Jackson | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 120 | NG Micah | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 122 | ADDIS Luken | 100% | 77% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 123 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 124 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 125 | LAVRINOVICH Christian | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 126 | PARK Maxwell | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 127 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 128 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 129 | HONG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 130 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 90% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 131 | ROMERO-UBIEDA Alejandro | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 132 | VADEN Oliver | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 133 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 134 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 135 | QUIGLEY Pierce | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 136 | TALWALKAR Vedant | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 137 | ROSOL Maximilian | 100% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 138 | LI Allen | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 138 | LU Lucas | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 140 | DELONG Finn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 141 | BESSELMAN Noah | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 142 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 143 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 143 | YI William | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 145 | POULIN Sam | 100% | 82% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 145 | GATZA Jason | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 147 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 148 | MCALLISTER thomas | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 148 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 150 | WHITE Taggart | 100% | 98% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 151 | KARPESHOV Maddox | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 152 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 154 | LI Johnson | 100% | 54% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.