St. Louis, MO - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | - | - | 7% | 39% | 53% | |
2 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 7% |
3 | GOOR Julian | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
3 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 47% | 32% | |
5 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
6 | YANG Luao | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
7 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
8 | LEE Aidan | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
9 | NG Eben S. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 28% | |
10 | OH Sean | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
11 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 11% |
12 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% | |
13 | SPINA Joseph B. | - | 3% | 28% | 46% | 20% | 3% | |
14 | JI Aidan Y. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
15 | REEVES Liam | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
16 | LIU Michael H. | - | 5% | 28% | 47% | 18% | 2% | |
17 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | 9% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | |
18 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 11% |
19 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
20 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
21 | LI Matthew | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
22 | ROEVER Sean M. | - | 7% | 39% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
23 | POLONSKI Anthony | 2% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
24 | ABRAHAM Aharon | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
25 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
26 | XU Andy P. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
27 | BECKFORD Gavin "Bailey" | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - | |
28 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 9% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
29 | LIN Michael | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
30 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 5% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
31 | IVES William R. | 4% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | |
32 | VEDRE-KYANAM KABIR BAIG Aaradhya | 10% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
33 | CHOE Jayden K. | 19% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
34 | FUKUDA Diego | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
35 | KOKKER Thomas | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | CHEN Junxuan | 35% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
38 | PARK Stephen | 55% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
39 | LIU Ethan | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - |
40 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 29% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | DAVIS Jace W. | 47% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | |
43 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.