St. Louis, MO - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BANERJEE ANUP | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | |
2 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 7% |
3 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
3 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 32% | |
5 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
6 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
7 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% |
8 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
9 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 28% | |
10 | OH Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | |
11 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 11% |
12 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% | |
13 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 23% | 3% | |
14 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
15 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
16 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 20% | 2% | |
17 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 3% | |
18 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 11% |
19 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
20 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
21 | LI Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
22 | ROEVER Sean M. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
23 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 7% | - | |
24 | ABRAHAM Aharon | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
25 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
26 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
27 | BECKFORD Gavin "Bailey" | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 2% | - | |
28 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 91% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
29 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
30 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 95% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
31 | IVES William R. | 100% | 96% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | |
32 | VEDRE-KYANAM KABIR BAIG Aaradhya | 100% | 90% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
33 | CHOE Jayden K. | 100% | 81% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
34 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
35 | KOKKER Thomas | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 65% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
38 | PARK Stephen | 100% | 45% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
39 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - |
40 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 100% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | DAVIS Jace W. | 100% | 53% | 7% | - | - | - | |
43 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.