Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | POPPER Luca G. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 2 | ZHOU Alan | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | CRASWELL Andrew J. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | MARCHANT Albert J. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 5 | BARREIRO Darren | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | MARTIN Liam N. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | ARIAS Troy A. | V V V D V D | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 8 | NIXON Christian A. | D V D V D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 9 | FENG Kevin T. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | V V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | HIRSCHMAN Burton E. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | DRAKE Owen G. | V D D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 15 | YAO Shun | V D D V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 16 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | V D D V D D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | PELLEGRINO Maurício | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 18 | SHAH S Ayush | V V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | SCHULTZ Alex | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 20 | PRICE Luke D. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 21 | WILSON Victor T. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 22 | MCCORMICK John B. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 23 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 24 | FENWICK Luke A. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 25 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 26 | KELSEY Ryan | D V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 27 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 28 | KIM Michael | V V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 29 | BAKER Julian L. | D D V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 30 | BOCEK Brodee M. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 31 | HERBEL Micah O. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 32 | SCHOWALTER Tyler J. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 33 | GOODMAN Zachary | V V V V D V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 34 | MOYSE Alexander S. | V D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 35 | MORRIS Alex K. | V D V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 36 | SMITH Ethan H. | D V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 37 | KNOWLES Ethan | V V V D D V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 38 | ASHER Andrew D. | V D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | REED Dusty (Allen) | V V V D D D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 40 | SHERWOOD Dominic | D V V D V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 41 | RINEHART Conner M. | V D D V D V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 42 | CHIEN William | D D V D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 43 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | V D D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 44 | HURST Palmer | D D D V V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 45 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 46 | WINTERSHEIMER Adam | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 47 | STEWART Robert | V D V D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 48 | KRAJ Pawel | D V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 49 | RICCHIUTI Nikola | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 50 | TIERNEY Luke | D V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 51 | LIPTON Michael D. | V D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 51 | PARK Jong-Eun | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 53 | GLECKNER Aidan | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 54 | FERNANDEZ Christopher | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 55 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | V D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 56 | BROWN Nathan P. | D D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 57 | ALI Adam | D V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 59 | BARAFF David | D D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 60 | GU Brian | D D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 61 | GERSEN Jacob | D D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 62 | SATTERWHITE William W. | D D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 62 | HERBEL Dellas O. | D D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 64 | KOLOCIN John | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 65 | KIRSCH Adam J. | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 66 | BARTCH Ethan L. | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 67 | RHEA Eric L. | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 68 | RITCHIE Mark T. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 69 | BURKE Luke P. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 70 | KATOPES Peter | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.