Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | POPPER Luca G. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 30% |
| 2 | ZHOU Alan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | CRASWELL Andrew J. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 3 | MARCHANT Albert J. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 5 | BARREIRO Darren | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 2% |
| 6 | MARTIN Liam N. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 7 | ARIAS Troy A. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 8 | NIXON Christian A. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | FENG Kevin T. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | - | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | HIRSCHMAN Burton E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 12 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 13 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | 4% | 30% | 44% | 19% | 2% |
| 14 | DRAKE Owen G. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 15 | YAO Shun | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | 1% | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | PELLEGRINO Maurício | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 18 | SHAH S Ayush | - | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 41% | 9% |
| 19 | SCHULTZ Alex | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 20 | PRICE Luke D. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
| 21 | WILSON Victor T. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 22 | MCCORMICK John B. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | FENWICK Luke A. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 25 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | KELSEY Ryan | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 27 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 28 | KIM Michael | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | BAKER Julian L. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | BOCEK Brodee M. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 31 | HERBEL Micah O. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 32 | SCHOWALTER Tyler J. | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 33 | GOODMAN Zachary | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 34 | MOYSE Alexander S. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | MORRIS Alex K. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 36 | SMITH Ethan H. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 37 | KNOWLES Ethan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 38 | ASHER Andrew D. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | REED Dusty (Allen) | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 40 | SHERWOOD Dominic | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 41 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 42 | CHIEN William | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 44 | HURST Palmer | 22% | 52% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | WINTERSHEIMER Adam | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 47 | STEWART Robert | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | KRAJ Pawel | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 49 | RICCHIUTI Nikola | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | TIERNEY Luke | 10% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LIPTON Michael D. | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | PARK Jong-Eun | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GLECKNER Aidan | 4% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | FERNANDEZ Christopher | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | BROWN Nathan P. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 57 | ALI Adam | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 59 | BARAFF David | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GU Brian | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GERSEN Jacob | 51% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 62 | HERBEL Dellas O. | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | KOLOCIN John | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | BARTCH Ethan L. | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 67 | RHEA Eric L. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | RITCHIE Mark T. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | BURKE Luke P. | 12% | 38% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | KATOPES Peter | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.