Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | POPPER Luca G. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 2 | ZHOU Alan | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | CRASWELL Andrew J. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | MARCHANT Albert J. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 5 | BARREIRO Darren | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | MARTIN Liam N. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | ARIAS Troy A. | V V V D V D | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 8 | NIXON Christian A. | D V D V D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 9 | FENG Kevin T. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | V V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | HIRSCHMAN Burton E. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | DRAKE Owen G. | V D D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 15 | YAO Shun | V D D V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 16 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | V D D V D D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | PELLEGRINO Maurício | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 18 | SHAH S Ayush | V V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | SCHULTZ Alex | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 20 | PRICE Luke D. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 21 | WILSON Victor T. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 22 | MCCORMICK John B. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 23 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 24 | FENWICK Luke A. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 25 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 26 | KELSEY Ryan | D V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 27 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 28 | KIM Michael | V V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 29 | BAKER Julian L. | D D V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 30 | BOCEK Brodee M. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 31 | HERBEL Micah O. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 32 | SCHOWALTER Tyler J. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 33 | GOODMAN Zachary | V V V V D V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 34 | MOYSE Alexander S. | V D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 35 | MORRIS Alex K. | V D V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 36 | SMITH Ethan H. | D V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 37 | KNOWLES Ethan | V V V D D V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 38 | ASHER Andrew D. | V D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | REED Dusty (Allen) | V V V D D D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 40 | SHERWOOD Dominic | D V V D V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 41 | RINEHART Conner M. | V D D V D V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 42 | CHIEN William | D D V D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 43 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | V D D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 44 | HURST Palmer | D D D V V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 45 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 46 | WINTERSHEIMER Adam | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 47 | STEWART Robert | V D V D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 48 | KRAJ Pawel | D V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 49 | RICCHIUTI Nikola | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 50 | TIERNEY Luke | D V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 51 | LIPTON Michael D. | V D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 51 | PARK Jong-Eun | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 53 | GLECKNER Aidan | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 54 | FERNANDEZ Christopher | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 55 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | V D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 56 | BROWN Nathan P. | D D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 57 | ALI Adam | D V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 59 | BARAFF David | D D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 60 | GU Brian | D D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 61 | GERSEN Jacob | D D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 62 | SATTERWHITE William W. | D D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 62 | HERBEL Dellas O. | D D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 64 | KOLOCIN John | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 65 | KIRSCH Adam J. | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 66 | BARTCH Ethan L. | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 67 | RHEA Eric L. | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 68 | RITCHIE Mark T. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 69 | BURKE Luke P. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 70 | KATOPES Peter | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.