Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHU Max | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | GILLISON Edward L. | D V V V V D | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | MENDOZA Zachari | V D D V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | ZHANG Alec | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | JIN daniel | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 6 | NOEL Sebastien A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 7 | WANG DEVON | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 8 | SINGHA Orion | V D D V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 9 | MOSES Alexander | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 10 | HIGGINS Branford | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 11 | KIM Darius H. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 12 | YAO Geoffrey B. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 13 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 14 | KOPPE Alexander | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 15 | LAGARNIA Luke | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 16 | PARK Elliot | V D D V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 17 | DRIBIN Ezra | V D V V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 18 | THOMPSON Chester | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 19 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | CHUNG Thomas | V V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | BAZHENOV Anthony | D D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 21 | JAIN Sarthak | V V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | ALFARO Justus | D V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 24 | EVANS noah | D V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 25 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 25 | MCDONALD Ethan | V D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 27 | DALVA Michael | V V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 28 | LO Jake | D D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 29 | MING Nathan | V V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 30 | CROSSMAN Brandon | V D D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 31 | FERRIERE Joshua | D V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 32 | SURAPANENI Arhan | D D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 33 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | V D D D V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 34 | PHUKAN Rohin | V D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 35 | CANDIA Trenton | V D V D V D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 36 | GAO Chaney C. | D V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 37 | KIM Nathan | V D D D V D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 38 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | D D D D V V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 39 | PAK Elliot | V D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 40 | GUPTA-GARCIA Krish | D D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 41 | ZHUANG William | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 42 | LIU Yikun | D V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 43 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 44 | LEE Jaden T. | D D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 44 | MENDOZA Zander | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 46 | CHEN Brian | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 48 | SACHS Sebastian | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 49 | LEE Chun Po | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 50 | VERNON Bennett | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 51 | SHA Michael | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 52 | KUO Rylan | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 52 | COPEN Samuel S. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 54 | CHUNG Michael | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 55 | COPEN Elliot P. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 55 | KIM Sullivan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.