Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHU Max | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 2 | GILLISON Edward L. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 3 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 3 | ZHANG Alec | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 5 | JIN daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% |
| 6 | NOEL Sebastien A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 7 | WANG DEVON | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 8 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 9 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% |
| 10 | HIGGINS Branford | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 11 | KIM Darius H. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 12 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 10% |
| 14 | KOPPE Alexander | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | LAGARNIA Luke | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 16 | PARK Elliot | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 17 | DRIBIN Ezra | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 18 | THOMPSON Chester | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 19 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 20 | CHUNG Thomas | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | BAZHENOV Anthony | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | JAIN Sarthak | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 23 | ALFARO Justus | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 24 | EVANS noah | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | MCDONALD Ethan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 27 | DALVA Michael | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | LO Jake | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | MING Nathan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | FERRIERE Joshua | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | SURAPANENI Arhan | 6% | 22% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 33 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 34 | PHUKAN Rohin | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | CANDIA Trenton | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 34% | 10% |
| 36 | GAO Chaney C. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 37 | KIM Nathan | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 38 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | PAK Elliot | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | GUPTA-GARCIA Krish | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | ZHUANG William | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 42 | LIU Yikun | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LEE Jaden T. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 44 | MENDOZA Zander | 3% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | CHEN Brian | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | 21% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | SACHS Sebastian | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | LEE Chun Po | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | VERNON Bennett | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SHA Michael | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KUO Rylan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 52 | COPEN Samuel S. | 8% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CHUNG Michael | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | COPEN Elliot P. | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | KIM Sullivan | 10% | 38% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.