Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 2 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 44% |
| 3 | GRIFFITH JACK | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 3 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 5 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% |
| 6 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 26% | 2% |
| 7 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 8 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 40% | 6% |
| 9 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% |
| 10 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 11 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 13 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 26% |
| 14 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | 3% |
| 15 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | 1% |
| 16 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 17 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 18 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 7% |
| 19 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 1% |
| 20 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 21 | GRASS James D. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 22% | 2% |
| 24 | COLLUM Thomas | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | PAN Henry | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 26 | QUINTERO Julian | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 28 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 73% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 84% | 41% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 30 | FIGUEROA ANDRES | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 32 | LI Matthew | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | AMMON Blue | 100% | 84% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 34 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | FERNANDEZ Santiago Martin | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | THROCKMORTON Robert | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DEMIR Omer | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | LEE EUNSOO | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | LEE EUNJAE | 100% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | BURKETT Jackson Cash | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.