Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SINGH Dayaal | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
2 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
3 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
3 | BAS Liam | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
5 | BAE Kevin | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
6 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
7 | KWON Ethan | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
8 | AHN Jun | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
9 | SHIKHMAN Robert | - | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
10 | BELLUOMO David C. | - | 7% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
11 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
12 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 6% |
13 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
14 | CHAN Tyler | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 9% |
15 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
16 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 9% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | |
17 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
19 | BALL James T. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
20 | NAGER Noah | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% | |
21 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | LEE Jacob J | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
23 | PYO Michael M. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
24 | TORRES Treston | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
25 | BASAK Ashton R. | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
26 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
27 | WANG Alex L. | 3% | 25% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
28 | BROWN Alexander R. | 2% | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
29 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
30 | PO Oliver | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
31 | SONG Bryan | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | BOBROW Logan | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
33 | YOON DYLAN | 17% | 50% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
34 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 2% | 31% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | GUO Jacob | 1% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | DAS Nikhil | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
37 | REZA Farazi | 56% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
39 | FRANK Amir | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.