Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 2 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 3 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 3 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 12% |
| 5 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 6 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% |
| 7 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 8 | AHN Jun | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% |
| 10 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 11 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
| 12 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 6% |
| 13 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 14 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 9% |
| 15 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% |
| 16 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 100% | 91% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% |
| 19 | BALL James T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 20 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 21 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 23 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 24 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | BASAK Ashton R. | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 27 | WANG Alex L. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | BROWN Alexander R. | 100% | 98% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 30 | PO Oliver | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 33 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 83% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 34 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 98% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | GUO Jacob | 100% | 99% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | DAS Nikhil | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | FRANK Amir | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.