Beaverton, OR - Beaverton, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | IYOKI Kent | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
| 2 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 3 | DIECK Logan O. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
| 3 | CHOI Isaac | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | |
| 5 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 6 | LATIF Imran Zakariyya | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
| 7 | WONG Nicholas A. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 36% | 9% |
| 8 | NOEL Sebastien A. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 23% | |
| 9 | MCLOUDREY Callan E. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 10 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 11 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 12 | PRITCHARD Aidan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | JACOBUS Curran | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 14 | HUANG Thomas | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 8% | |
| 15 | PARKS Isaac | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 16 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 17 | BEALL Calvin A. | - | 3% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 4% | |
| 18 | MCFARLAND Kai | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 19 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 20 | DAO Alexander | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 21 | WOLFE Alex | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHIN Dylan A. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | GUPTA Karan | - | 7% | 37% | 40% | 14% | 2% | |
| 24 | DU SHUNYU K. | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | BAGCHI Aritra | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | KAO Yishane | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 28 | ISRAEL Reason E. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | STRONG David | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | JUNG Won Joon | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SHERMAN Thomas | 12% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | GOLDMAN Grant | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | GOLLIN Luke | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | BUERGISSER Kai | 26% | 58% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | BLANCO Renn | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | KNUDSEN Travis | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | DONDISCH ilan | 55% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.