Beaverton, OR - Beaverton, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GOOR Julian | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
2 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
3 | WYMAN Julian | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
3 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
5 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
6 | KIM Andrew J. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
7 | LEE Christopher T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 51% | 10% |
8 | RUBIN Max | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | < 1% |
9 | LLIDO Soren | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
10 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
10 | SIU Aiden | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
12 | WOO Christian | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
13 | MIN Eric | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
14 | WU Lucas | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
15 | RANJITH Yash M. | - | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
16 | MA Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
17 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
18 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
19 | CHEN Justin K. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
20 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
21 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
22 | PO Oliver | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
23 | FUKUDA Diego | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
24 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
25 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
26 | OH Jaden | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | - |
27 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
28 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
29 | LIN Michael | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
30 | RAJ Jay | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
31 | ZENG Chuyi | 7% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
32 | SHAGIDANYAN German | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
33 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
34 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
35 | SHEN Oliver | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
36 | YU Jason | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
37 | KIM Harrison | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
38 | LEVY Jacob | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
39 | FANG Jaden | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
40 | LING Eddie | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
41 | LIU William | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
42 | ZHONG Alan D. | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
43 | HUBATKA Jarry Q. | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
44 | NG Micah | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
45 | BARTELS Marc | 3% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
46 | ZHU Raymond | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
47 | MAKO Keegan | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
48 | LO Preston | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
49 | MA Bryant | 4% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | AGRAWAL Niki | 4% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | |
51 | DERRICK Blake | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
52 | WU Alber Y. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
53 | SAH Steven | 10% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
54 | LYNCH Owen C. | - | < 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
55 | LI Samuel | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | KIM Aiden | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
56 | DONG Quintin | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
58 | ZHANG Graham | 23% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
59 | WU Alistair | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | ZHANG Luke | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
61 | SONG Jeremy | 13% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
62 | KIM Teo | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
62 | NGUYEN martin | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
64 | LOFTUS Luca | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | - |
65 | YUE Jackson | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
66 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 50% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
67 | FLENNIKEN Liam | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
68 | ANDREWS William | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.