Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports Center - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 2 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
| 3 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 3 | EKE Frank | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 5 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 6 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 26% |
| 7 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 8 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 9 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 9 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 11 | KNOX James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 12 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 2% |
| 13 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 14 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 15 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 90% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 18 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 19 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 20 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 21 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 22 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 23 | JOSLIN Tyler | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | STABB Xuan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 25 | NATSVLISHVILI John Vano | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | WEI HUNTER | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 29 | WIECHMANN Colin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 30 | ZHANG ethan | 100% | 87% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | WANG Max S | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 33 | MING Isaac | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 35 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | XU Alexander | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | DORASZELSKI Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 39 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 39 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | SUN Jason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 42 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | WANG Yi Nan | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | KALKANIS George | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | TEH Steven | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 50 | JACKSON Nicholas | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 52 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | BYUN Kevin | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | MCWILLIAMS Miles | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SHULKIN Mark | 100% | 87% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | CLEMENTS Dylan | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.