New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PRIHODKO Max | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 2 | CHOI Mason | - | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% | |
| 3 | RYAN Joshua P. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 5 | PARK Frederick | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 6 | ZENG Zihan | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 7 | WIECHMANN Colin | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 8 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 9 | DIPAOLA Steven M. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 10 | SPRINGER Michael | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
| 11 | HERMANSON David B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 12 | PAINTER Patrick I. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 13 | SUN Jason | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | KUMAR Aidan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 15 | LEE Hudson | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 16 | CRAIR David | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 17 | CHEN Jun Ho | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 18 | MATEI Daniel | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 20 | KALKANIS George | 27% | 44% | 23% | 6% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 21 | SIMPSON Patrick | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 22 | STALL-RYAN Jonathan | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 23 | CHOE Andrew | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 24 | LI Jalen | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | PAN Colin | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | JENNINGS Adin | 4% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 28 | MAHESH Tarun | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 29 | PAHLAVI Kamran | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | |
| 30 | LAI Aedin | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | FENG Du | 4% | 24% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | WANG Yi Nan | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | RUSSELL Edward | - | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 34 | SAVORETTI Francesco | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 35 | ROLLO Emmett H. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | SKAALAND Will | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 37 | CHESNEY Aiden R. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 38 | STANKEVICZ Timothy G. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 39 | HEKMAT Sina R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 40 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
| 41 | SUN Jeffery | 6% | 39% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 44 | PARK Nicholas | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 45 | COVAL Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | REELS Eric J. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 47 | SMEDLEY Drew N. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 48 | CAFASSO martin | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | SRIVASTAVA Ishaan | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | PETROV Niki J. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 51 | MELCHER Charles | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 52 | WU Jonathan | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 53 | GONG Haixiang | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 54 | MORTON William | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 55 | LUO Peter | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 55 | SEOL Austin | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 57 | GRAYSON Joshua | 38% | 40% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | XIE Brandon | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | PATEL Pratik | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 60 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | QI Terry | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | SMOTROFF Joshua L. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 63 | PALLADINO Ben T. | 6% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | CHU Wenxi | 7% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | TORRES Gianni | 2% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 66 | TANG WanLi | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 67 | GWINN William | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | BYARS John | 20% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 69 | BUTTS Brendan | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 70 | PARKER B | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 71 | LIU Jeremiah | 5% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | BISSET Luke | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | BOZZUTO Bradley | 17% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | TEREB Daniel | 8% | 45% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | KUZEBSKI Arkadiusz | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.