New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
2 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
3 | RYAN Joshua P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
3 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
5 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
6 | ZENG Zihan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
7 | WIECHMANN Colin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
8 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
9 | DIPAOLA Steven M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
10 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
11 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
12 | PAINTER Patrick I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
13 | SUN Jason | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
14 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
15 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 9% | |
16 | CRAIR David | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
18 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
18 | MATEI Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
20 | KALKANIS George | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | < 1% | - |
21 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
22 | STALL-RYAN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
23 | CHOE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
24 | LI Jalen | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
25 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
26 | PAN Colin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
27 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
28 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% | |
30 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
30 | FENG Du | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
32 | WANG Yi Nan | 100% | 94% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | RUSSELL Edward | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
34 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
35 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
36 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
37 | CHESNEY Aiden R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
38 | STANKEVICZ Timothy G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
39 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
40 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
41 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 94% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | |
42 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
43 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
44 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
45 | COVAL Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
46 | REELS Eric J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
47 | SMEDLEY Drew N. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
48 | CAFASSO martin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
49 | SRIVASTAVA Ishaan | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
50 | PETROV Niki J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
51 | MELCHER Charles | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
52 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
53 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
54 | MORTON William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
55 | LUO Peter | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
55 | SEOL Austin | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | GRAYSON Joshua | 100% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
58 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
59 | PATEL Pratik | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
61 | QI Terry | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
62 | SMOTROFF Joshua L. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
63 | PALLADINO Ben T. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
64 | CHU Wenxi | 100% | 93% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
65 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
66 | TANG WanLi | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
67 | GWINN William | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | BYARS John | 100% | 80% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
69 | BUTTS Brendan | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
70 | PARKER B | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
71 | LIU Jeremiah | 100% | 95% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
72 | BISSET Luke | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
73 | BOZZUTO Bradley | 100% | 83% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
73 | TEREB Daniel | 100% | 92% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
75 | KUZEBSKI Arkadiusz | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.