Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% |
| 2 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
| 3 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 3 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 5 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | |
| 6 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 7 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 34% |
| 8 | KANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 9 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 9 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 9 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 12 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 13 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 14 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | 1% |
| 15 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 17 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 18 | TANG Albert | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | < 1% |
| 19 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
| 20 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% |
| 21 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | - |
| 22 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 23 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
| 24 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 25 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 27 | GUO Justin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 28 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | 2% | |
| 29 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 30 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 31 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 32 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 33 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 34 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 35 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 36 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | LI Aaron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 38 | MIN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 39 | ARIZA Abraham J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 40 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 41 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | LI Allen | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 44 | HAN Derek | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 45 | LO Preston | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% |
| 47 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 48 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 49 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 50 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 51 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 52 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 53 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 54 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | XU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 57 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 58 | WU Lucas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | TANG Terry | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 60 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 61 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 62 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 63 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 64 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 65 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 66 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 67 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 68 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 1% | |
| 69 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 70 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 71 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 72 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 73 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LI Samuel | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 75 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 76 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 77 | ALVAREZ ADRIAN ALEJANDRO | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 78 | TALASILA Arush | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 8% | - | |
| 79 | SONG Noel | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 81 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% | 2% |
| 82 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 83 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 84 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 85 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 86 | SZIRAKI Jordan | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 87 | RUSSELL Paul | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 88 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 88 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 88 | GERRISH William | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 91 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 92 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 96 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 97 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 95% | 59% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 98 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 85% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 100 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 101 | LI Lianhan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 102 | KETTELLE John | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 103 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 104 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 105 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | KIM Harrison | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 107 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 108 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 109 | LIU William | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 110 | CHEN Kelton | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | MO Ethan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 112 | CHEW Aaron | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 113 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 114 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 115 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 116 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 117 | PAULUS Gregory | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 118 | CHEN David | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 119 | JOBE Connor M. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 119 | FINDLAY Zachary | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 121 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 121 | HE Bourne | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 123 | KOE Beckett | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 124 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.