Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
2 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 40% |
3 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
3 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 15% |
5 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% |
6 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
7 | OH Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
8 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 11% |
9 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
10 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 20% |
11 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - |
12 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 5% |
13 | LIU Jacob B. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
14 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
15 | FLYNN Ian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
16 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
17 | ORR Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% |
18 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 4% |
19 | KIM Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
20 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
21 | LIN Michael | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
22 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - |
23 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
24 | KIM Harrison | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
25 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 93% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
26 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
27 | MIN Eric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
27 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
27 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
30 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
31 | RAJPAL Alastair | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 15% | 1% |
32 | SMITH Cooper | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
33 | HAN Derek | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
34 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
35 | LO Preston | 100% | 97% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
36 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
37 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
39 | KELLY Tommy | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
40 | BURBERRY Alan | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
41 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
42 | CHOE Jayden K. | 100% | 86% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.