DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
| 2 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 3 | SHELANSKI Isaac | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 38% | |
| 3 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 5 | CHEN Eric | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 6 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 7 | CAO Albert | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 8 | HE Lawrence | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | RICHARDS Dick | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
| 10 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 11 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 12 | RHYU Kozmo | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | CAO Brad | - | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | SU Caleb | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 17% | |
| 15 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 16 | STEVENS Daniel | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 13% |
| 17 | WALTHER Bryan M. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 40% | 9% | |
| 18 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | - | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 19 | WOLFE Alex | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% | |
| 21 | EVANS Allen L. | - | 9% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 22 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 23 | CHAWLA Armaan | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | PAINTER Patrick I. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | KING Cameron | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | WANG Trontour | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 28 | ROBITZSKI David R. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | - |
| 29 | METZLER Calder | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | ILYAS Zakariya | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | HUGHES Michael D. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | JARRELL Keegan | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | BOWIE Charlotta | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | KIM Ryan | 20% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | BANNEN Nicholas | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | LIU Nicole | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | YANG Alisa | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 38 | MOORE IV Louis P. | 3% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | KWOUN Miles S. | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | FRENCH Phaelen | 11% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | UPHAM Karolyn | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | LIN Harrison | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | METZLER Jack | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.