Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
2 | MOHAMED Amir | V V V D V D | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
3 | LEE Aidan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | GAO William | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
5 | OH SEAN | V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
6 | YANG Luao | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
7 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
8 | KUMAMOTO Sota | V V V D D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
9 | KEE Andrew L. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
10 | LIN James G. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
11 | ORLOV Dmitriy | D V V V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
12 | WANG Winston | D V V V V | V V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
13 | LIN Michael | V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
14 | PO Oliver | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
15 | ZHENG zhe | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
16 | LIU Eric Y. | D D D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
17 | LEE Jacob | V V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
18 | MOHAMED Murad | D V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
19 | KNIZHNIK David | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | LI Matthew | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
21 | TANG Owen S. | D V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
22 | SONG Bryan | V V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
23 | LUH Ethan K. | V D V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
24 | WOO Christian | V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
25 | REEVES Liam | V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
26 | TAHOUN Mostafa | V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
27 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | D V V V D D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
28 | KLYCZEK Andrew | D V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
29 | WANG Brayden | V D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
30 | TIKHAEV Alexander | D D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
31 | ALONSO Vinicius | D D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
32 | LEE Lukas | D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
33 | YAO Bradley | V D D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
34 | WECHSLER Jacob | D V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
35 | SONG Austin | V V V D D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
36 | PAN Henry | D V V D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
37 | PITERBARG Maxim | V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
38 | DE COQUET Maximilian | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
39 | HUANG Eythan | D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
40 | TANG Albert | V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
41 | LIANG David | V V D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
42 | POLONSKI Anthony | V D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
43 | QIAN Jason H. | D V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
44 | LIU Ryan | D D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
45 | RNO Kyler | V V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
46 | TANG August L. | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
47 | DANIZ T FERNANDO A. | D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
48 | KETTELLE John | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
49 | MAO Lucas | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
50 | KLOTZ Isaiah | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
51 | CHO Xzander | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
52 | HAN Derek | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
53 | SEMP Iain | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
54 | TANG Alexander L. | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
54 | YAP Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
56 | QUINN Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
57 | DUNLAP Ian | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
58 | PRICE Owen | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
59 | WATSON Logan | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.