Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% | |
| 2 | MOHAMED Amir | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 6% |
| 3 | LEE Aidan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 3 | GAO William | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
| 5 | OH SEAN | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 6 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 7 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 8 | KUMAMOTO Sota | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 9 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% |
| 10 | LIN James G. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
| 11 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 12 | WANG Winston | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | LIN Michael | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 14 | PO Oliver | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | ZHENG zhe | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | LIU Eric Y. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 17 | LEE Jacob | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 18 | MOHAMED Murad | - | - | 2% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 13% |
| 19 | KNIZHNIK David | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 29% | 3% | |
| 20 | LI Matthew | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 21 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 22 | SONG Bryan | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 24 | WOO Christian | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 25 | REEVES Liam | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 26 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
| 28 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | WANG Brayden | 1% | 17% | 53% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 7% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | ALONSO Vinicius | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 32 | LEE Lukas | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | YAO Bradley | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% |
| 35 | SONG Austin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | PAN Henry | 20% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | PITERBARG Maxim | - | 9% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 1% | |
| 38 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 1% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | - | |
| 39 | HUANG Eythan | 1% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | TANG Albert | 6% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | LIANG David | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 42 | POLONSKI Anthony | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | QIAN Jason H. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 44 | LIU Ryan | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | RNO Kyler | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | TANG August L. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 47 | DANIZ T FERNANDO A. | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | KETTELLE John | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MAO Lucas | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHO Xzander | 26% | 55% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | HAN Derek | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | SEMP Iain | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | TANG Alexander L. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | YAP Nathan | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | QUINN Nathan | 55% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | DUNLAP Ian | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | PRICE Owen | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | WATSON Logan | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.