Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 2 | GRIFFIN John O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 3 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 3 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 5 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 6 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 7 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | |
| 8 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 6% |
| 9 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 9 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 11 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 12 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
| 13 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 14 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | DIVENTI Paul W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% | |
| 16 | PRASANNA Advaith | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 17 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | ||
| 19 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 6% |
| 20 | WAN Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 14% |
| 21 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 22 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 23 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
| 24 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
| 25 | GU Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 26 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 27 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 29 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 79% | 31% | 5% | - | ||
| 30 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% | ||
| 31 | UPTON Craig | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 32 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
| 35 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 36 | DING Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 37 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 38 | WALTER Evran M. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 40 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 41 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 42 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 9% | ||
| 43 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 44 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 45 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | ROUNTREE Rob | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 47 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 48 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | EVANS Aidan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 54 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | KOBAL Maximilian | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 56 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 58 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GAUTAM Vishnu | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | NEWELL Ian A. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 81% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 67 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | ||
| 68 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 69 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 69 | VIVEROS Antonio | 100% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.