Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Ziyuan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 2 | KO Brian J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 3 | CHENG Matthew S. | - | - | 8% | 34% | 47% | 11% | |
| 3 | DIVITO Dylan | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% | |
| 5 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 6 | DIERKS Kian | - | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% |
| 7 | YU Anders | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 46% | |
| 8 | JAIN Aditya | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 9 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 10 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 11 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | |
| 12 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 33% |
| 14 | OH Samuel H. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 49% | 21% |
| 15 | GOOR Julian | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 16 | LI Raphael C. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 17 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% |
| 18 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 35% |
| 19 | LEVY Jacob M. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% |
| 19 | SIU Aiden | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 21 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 22 | WOO Christian | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | WU Conrad J. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | LIN Dashiell | - | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 24% | |
| 25 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% |
| 26 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | CHAN Tyler | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 43% | 18% |
| 28 | WYMAN Julian | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 29 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 30 | TAN Christien | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 41% | |
| 32 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 33 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 21% | |
| 34 | LAO Scott E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 49% | 12% |
| 35 | LARA Diego | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 36 | DANKAR Neel | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
| 37 | WU Jerry Z. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 39% | 6% |
| 38 | LE Jacob W. | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 39 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
| 40 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | CHENG Nathan | - | 1% | 13% | 41% | 36% | 9% | - |
| 42 | WANG Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 43 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 2% |
| 45 | LI Avery Peihong | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | KIM Ryan Y. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 47 | DINSAY Kristjan | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | DETERING Julian | - | 9% | 41% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 49 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | 5% | 30% | 45% | 18% | 1% | |
| 50 | LIM Charles Q. | 4% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 52 | JORDON Kaleb W. | - | 8% | 31% | 42% | 16% | 2% | |
| 53 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 54 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | MORALES Ian N. | - | - | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 56 | WONG Luke S. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 4% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
| 58 | KANG Anthony | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 59 | ANDERSON Jacob | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 60 | SEAL Maximus R. | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GOBBO Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 62 | MA Andrew | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 63 | OH Jaden | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | CHENG Jonathan | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 66 | MA Bryant | 2% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 1% | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 68 | WANG Ethan | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | HUANG Kevin D. | 3% | 29% | 44% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 70 | KIM Derek A. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 71 | CHEN Justin K. | 3% | 34% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 73 | VALOUEV Aleksey | - | 6% | 44% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 74 | SHEN Owen | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 75 | BAEK David | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 76 | KIM Andrew J. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 77 | CHUANG Kian J. | 1% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 78 | CHI Alexander | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 79 | LIEBERMAN Grant | 6% | 36% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | TEH Ryan | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | NGUYEN William | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 82 | LI Jett | 2% | 17% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 83 | NGUYEN Liam | 5% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 84 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 5% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | CHEN Brian | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | MYERS Dean | 14% | 59% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 87 | PARZICK Wade | 76% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 88 | ELVANDER Ethan | 30% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 89 | ZHENG zhe | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 90 | LLIDO Soren | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 91 | KIM Aiden | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | GOLDADE Luke A. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 93 | BROWN Darius D. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 94 | RAINS Jackson T. | 21% | 65% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 95 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 96 | KRAUSE Colin | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 97 | RUBIN Max | 12% | 60% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 98 | SMITH Grant D. | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 99 | PARK Sky | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 100 | MO Jason | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 101 | RAMOS Jaydon | 71% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 102 | TUAN Evan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 103 | ULLOA Trent J. | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | GRITCHEN Alex | 70% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | BARTSCH Henry | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 38% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 107 | AGRAWAL Niki | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 108 | MAK Osman K. | 22% | 50% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.