Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Ziyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
2 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
3 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 11% | |
3 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | |
5 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
6 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% |
7 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
8 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
9 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
10 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
11 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 9% | |
12 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
14 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 21% |
15 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
16 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
17 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
18 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
19 | LEVY Jacob M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% |
19 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
21 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
22 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
23 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
24 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% | |
25 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
26 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
27 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 18% |
28 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
29 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
30 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
31 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
32 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
33 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 21% | |
34 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 12% |
35 | LARA Diego | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
36 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | |
37 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 6% |
38 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 6% | - |
39 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% |
40 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
41 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | 10% | - |
42 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
43 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
44 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | 2% |
45 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
46 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | - |
47 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
48 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 91% | 50% | 11% | 1% | |
49 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 19% | 1% | |
50 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 96% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - | |
51 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | |
52 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 18% | 2% | |
53 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
54 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
55 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 52% | 13% | 1% |
56 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 5% | |
58 | KANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 4% | |
59 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 78% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
60 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
61 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
62 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
63 | OH Jaden | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
64 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
65 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
66 | MA Bryant | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
68 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 97% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - | |
70 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
71 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 97% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
72 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
73 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 93% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - |
74 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | BAEK David | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
76 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
77 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
78 | CHI Alexander | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
79 | LIEBERMAN Grant | 100% | 94% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
80 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
80 | NGUYEN William | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
82 | LI Jett | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
83 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 95% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
84 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 95% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
85 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
86 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 86% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
87 | PARZICK Wade | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
88 | ELVANDER Ethan | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
89 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
90 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
91 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
92 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
93 | BROWN Darius D. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
94 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 79% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
95 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
96 | KRAUSE Colin | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
97 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 88% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
98 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
99 | PARK Sky | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
100 | MO Jason | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
101 | RAMOS Jaydon | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
102 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
103 | ULLOA Trent J. | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
104 | GRITCHEN Alex | 100% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
104 | BARTSCH Henry | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
104 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
107 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
108 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 78% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.