Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WEAVER Neil | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | LI Patrick | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | YOUNG Jr Colby | V D V V V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | AHN Gus | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 5 | SMITH Jackson | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 6 | KOPPE Alexander | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 7 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 8 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | D D V D V | V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | ZHENG Haoran | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | SARKAR agniv | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | QUITORIANO Matthew | V V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | D V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 13 | HARRIS Roark S. | D V V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 14 | LIANG Aaron | V D D V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 15 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | D V V D D V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | ZHANG Andrew | D D D V D D | V V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 17 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
| 18 | JONES Caleb | V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 19 | KNUDSEN Travis | D V V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 20 | SARKAR Anish | D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 20 | KIRK Marcus Haagen | V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | AYABINA JR John | D V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | WARD Edward | D V D V D V | V D | 5.3 | 3 | -2.3 |
| 24 | LEE Richard U. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | HARR Carver | D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | BAGCHI Aritra | V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 27 | CROSSMAN Brandon | D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | BURLING Trenor | D V D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 29 | SCHROEDER Dylan | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 31 | LEE Joseph J. | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 32 | MIAO KUNQI | D D D D V | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 33 | WANG owen | V V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 34 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 35 | GAURIAT Olivier | V D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 36 | MUNOZ Humberto | D D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 37 | WONG Nathan | D V V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 38 | ROBSON Sam | D V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 39 | COMER Alexander J. | D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 40 | CUEVAS Tom | D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 41 | ZHANG Nathan | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 42 | WATT Darren | V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 43 | WEISSGERBER Kenneth | D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 44 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 45 | LIU Yikun | V D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 46 | LAU Christian | D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 47 | ANDERSON Donald | V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 48 | KIM Sullivan | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 49 | LEE Chun Po | D D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 50 | MAJAM Audie | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 51 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.