Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YU Anders | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
2 | WOO Christian | - | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 3% |
3 | LIN Dashiell | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
3 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
5 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 13% |
6 | DIERKS Kian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
7 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
8 | SIU Aiden | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
9 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
10 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
11 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% |
12 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 10% | |
13 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 19% |
14 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% |
15 | LI Avery Peihong | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - |
16 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
17 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
18 | BAEK David | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
19 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% |
20 | SEAL Maximus R. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
20 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
22 | DANKAR Neel | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
23 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 35% |
24 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
25 | CHEN Justin K. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
26 | TEH Ryan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
27 | GOBBO Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 4% |
28 | LLIDO Soren | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
29 | MA Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 1% |
30 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
31 | NGUYEN Liam | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | SHEN Owen | 1% | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | WU Jerry Z. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 21% |
34 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
35 | WANG Ethan | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% | - |
36 | LI Raphael C. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
37 | DETERING Julian | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
38 | WONG Luke S. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
39 | KANG Anthony | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
40 | TAN Christien | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
41 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% |
42 | CHI Alexander | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
43 | LE Jacob W. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
43 | KIM Aiden | 2% | 18% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | TAN Peter | - | 1% | 18% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
46 | EDISON Ansel | 26% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
47 | CHENG Jonathan | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
49 | ANDERSON Jacob | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
50 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
50 | OH Jaden | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
52 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
53 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 4% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
54 | MA Bryant | 3% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
55 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
56 | KRAUSE Colin | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
57 | MYERS Dean | 1% | 9% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
58 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 6% |
59 | ZHENG zhe | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
60 | PARK Sky | 43% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
62 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
63 | LEE Dylan | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
64 | MO Jason | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
65 | CHUANG Kian J. | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - |
66 | YU Leo | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | AGRAWAL Niki | 24% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
68 | PONS Diego | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
69 | TUAN Evan | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
70 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
71 | ELVANDER Ethan | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
72 | LI Jett | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
73 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 36% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
74 | RUBIN Max | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
75 | PARZICK Wade | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
76 | SMITH Grant D. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
77 | GRITCHEN Alex | 46% | 48% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
78 | ULLOA Trent J. | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
79 | MAK Osman K. | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
80 | RAINS Jackson T. | 37% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | NGUYEN William | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
82 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 29% | 50% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
83 | LU Ruofei | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.