Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 2 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 3% |
| 3 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 3 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
| 5 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 13% |
| 6 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
| 7 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 8 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 9 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% |
| 10 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% |
| 11 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
| 12 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 10% | |
| 13 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 19% |
| 14 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 4% |
| 15 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | - |
| 16 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 17 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% |
| 18 | BAEK David | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 19 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% |
| 20 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 20 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
| 23 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 24 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
| 25 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 4% |
| 28 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 1% |
| 30 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 31 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 33 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% |
| 34 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 35 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 36 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 37 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 38 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | KANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 40 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 41 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 9% |
| 42 | CHI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 43 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | TAN Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 47 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% |
| 49 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 50 | OH Jaden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 53 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | MA Bryant | 100% | 97% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 55 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 56 | KRAUSE Colin | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 99% | 90% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 58 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 6% |
| 59 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 60 | PARK Sky | 100% | 57% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 62 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 63 | LEE Dylan | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | MO Jason | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 65 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 66 | YU Leo | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 68 | PONS Diego | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 69 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 70 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 71 | ELVANDER Ethan | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 72 | LI Jett | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 73 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 64% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | PARZICK Wade | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | GRITCHEN Alex | 100% | 54% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 78 | ULLOA Trent J. | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 79 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 63% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 80 | NGUYEN William | 100% | 78% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 100% | 71% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | LU Ruofei | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.