King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | BAS Liam | V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
2 | KWON Ethan | V V D V D | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
3 | BAE Kevin | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
3 | AHN Jun | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
5 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
6 | ONIK Elijah T. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
7 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
8 | HAN Lawrence | V D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
9 | BELLUOMO David C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
10 | DAI Jonathan T. | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
11 | LE Vyn A. | D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
12 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
13 | FU Samuel Y. | D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
14 | LEE Jacob J | V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
15 | CHENG Jonathan | D V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
16 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | D V D V D | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
17 | BADLANI Dev | D V V V V | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
18 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | V V V D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
19 | MOHAMED Amir | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
20 | TAHOUN Mostafa | V V D V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
21 | MOHAMED Murad | V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
22 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | D V D V D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
23 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
24 | PO Oliver | V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
25 | KLOTZ Isaiah | D D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
26 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
27 | HOWARD Michael | V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
28 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
29 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
30 | TALLARICO Matthew | D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
31 | MILLER Aidan A. | D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
32 | LIN James G. | D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
33 | WANG Jackson | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
34 | BAUMANN Gunnar | V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
35 | TRUBETSKI David | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
36 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
37 | LEVIN Daniel | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
38 | SONG Bryan | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
39 | DOUGLASS Viktor | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
40 | BASAK Ashton R. | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
41 | POIROT Max | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
42 | DAS Nikhil | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.