Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KOKENGE Reid | V D V V | V V V V V | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 2 | HE Lawrence | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | COHEN Jared | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | MA Shuhe | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 5 | SHAFAIE Ali | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | NIXON Christian | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 7 | KIM Byung | V V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris | V V D D V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 9 | MOTIR Lucas | V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 10 | BARREIRO Darren | V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 11 | FRANCIS Daniel | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 11 | SHEN Max | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | WOLFE Alex | V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | WANG Eric S. | V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | ARAVIND Athreya | D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 16 | CHEN Eric | D V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | CONNELLY Michael | D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 18 | SHREM Samuel | D D V V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 19 | MATTO Edward | V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 20 | MARTINEZ Joshua | V V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | HECHT Mark | D V V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 22 | SUN James | V V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 23 | KOKENGE Chad | V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 24 | TAUBLER Michelle | V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | WU Jason | D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 26 | LESSER Jeremy | V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 27 | CORRIDON Jack (John) | V D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 28 | GROOM Layne | V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 29 | WERR Tyler | V V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | LI Jeffrey | D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 31 | WEN Ethan | D D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | ANDERSON Riley | D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 33 | FLINT James | D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 34 | GILLER Augustus | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 35 | RITTMAN Zacc | D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 36 | YAGNIK Yash | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 37 | BUSSINGER Samantha | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 38 | MIGLIETTA Lauren | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 39 | WINSLOW Michael | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 39 | DESTEFANO Domenic | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.