New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | WU Joseph | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | MORSE Tyler | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SMITH Nicholas S. | V D D D V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 5 | KOBI Samuel | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 6 | BEZRODNOV Michael | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | EKE Frank | D D V V D V | V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 9 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | PRIHODKO Max | V V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 11 | SKAALAND Will | D V V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 12 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 14 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | V D D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 15 | MISHIMA Torata | D V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 16 | LAI Aedin | D V D D D | V V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 17 | RICHARD Owen | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 18 | SHAH Maximilian A. | V V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 19 | ROLLO Emmett H. | V V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 20 | HE Lawrence | V V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | WADE Grayson | D V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | GORTI Agustya | V D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | GUI Runlin | V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | SOOMRO Adam A. | V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 24 | BEALS Alden | V V D V D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 26 | FELDMAN Jaemin | V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 27 | MACARTY Jordan T. | D D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 28 | YANG Edward | D D V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 29 | GAO Daniel | D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 30 | LIEF Isaac R. | D V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 31 | LURVEY Samuel | D V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 32 | LAI Coby | V D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 33 | LEE Hudson | D D V V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 34 | CHEN Jun Ho | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 35 | ROSENBERG Jacob | D V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 36 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | D V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 37 | KUMAR Aidan | V V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 38 | KOKENGE Reid | D V D V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 39 | LANGTON Sawyer | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 40 | SHEN Max | D D V D D V | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 41 | CHEN Eric | D D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 42 | ZENG Zihan | D V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 43 | JOSLIN Tyler | D V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 44 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 45 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 46 | STABB Xuan | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 46 | OSTIGUY Cameron | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 48 | MILLER Kurt | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 49 | TANG WanLi | D D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 50 | FUSSMAN Yuval | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 51 | DISIMONE David Z. | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 52 | HU Robert J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 53 | BYARS John | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.