New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 2 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 3 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 38% |
| 3 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 5 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
| 6 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 7 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
| 8 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 9 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 10 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 11 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 12 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
| 13 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 14 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
| 15 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 16 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 17 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 18 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 19 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 21 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 12% | |
| 22 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 23 | GU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 24 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 26 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 6% |
| 27 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
| 29 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | 6% | |
| 30 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 97% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 32 | GUERRERO Isaac C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 34 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 37 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 38 | VALENTON Timothy | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | PO Oliver | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 40 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 85% | 43% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 98% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 90% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 45 | WU Michael | 100% | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 100% | 73% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 50 | LIN James G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 51 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 52 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 53 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 54 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | GARDOS Noah | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | POPE Alexander | 100% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | SHIKHMANQ Lennon | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 77% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | WERTZ Erik | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.