Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHUGART Henry R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
| 2 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 9% |
| 3 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 3 | HE Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 29% | |
| 5 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 6 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 7 | LEE Alexander G. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 8 | HUANG Zijin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 9 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 10 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
| 11 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 12 | CHOI Isaac | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 13 | LIU Kyle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 100% | 93% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | TOWNSEND Avery S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 19 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 20 | SOLTER Kai | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | KOPPE Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 83% | 42% | 9% | - | |
| 22 | KAJI Ty | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 23 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 25 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | HANRATTY Liam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHANG RUOMU | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | MUFIC Oliver | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | ROMERO Caleb E. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | DIECK Logan O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 30 | GRAY Joshua | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 32 | FOWLER Henry | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | PAI Nandan K. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | KOH Tommy | 100% | 55% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.