Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 2 | SIU Aiden | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 3 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 3 | KIM Ryan Y. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 5 | MA Andrew | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 6 | LIN Michael | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 7 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 8 | OH Jaden | - | 4% | 31% | 45% | 18% | 2% |
| 9 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 10 | CHOI Ethan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 11 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 12 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | 6% | 29% | 47% | 18% |
| 13 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 14 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 8% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 15 | GOGOI Vir K. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 16 | YAO Bradley | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | REEVES Liam | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 18 | LIU Jacob B. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 40% | 7% |
| 20 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 21 | TANG August L. | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 22 | REYES Omar | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% |
| 23 | LLIDO Soren | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 24 | MIN Eric | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 48% |
| 25 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 26 | JI Aidan Y. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 27 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 2% |
| 28 | TANG Alexander L. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | HUANG Eythan | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LING Eddie | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 31 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | XU Andy P. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 33 | SPINA Joseph B. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | HAN Derek | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | 6% | 38% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 36 | DINSAY Kristjan | 4% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 37 | ZHANG Aaron | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | LIU Ethan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 39 | NICOLETTI Luca | 24% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 41 | WANG Jackson | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 42 | ZHOU Leon | 4% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 43 | FUKUDA Diego | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 13% | |
| 44 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 45 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 46 | ALLEN Henry G. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | WU Lucas | 8% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 48 | NGUYEN martin | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 7% | 62% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | MA Bryant | 15% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | PARK Gabriel | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | SISINNI Riccardo | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | PARK Sangmin | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | TANG Albert | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 56 | BAYLDON william | 87% | 13% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | EDWARDS Maxon | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | FINDLAY Zachary | 36% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.