Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 3 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 3 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 5 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 6 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% |
| 7 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 8 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 20% | 2% |
| 9 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 10 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 11 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 12 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 18% |
| 13 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 14 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 15 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 16 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 18 | LIU Jacob B. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | 7% |
| 20 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 21 | TANG August L. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | |
| 22 | REYES Omar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 23 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 24 | MIN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% |
| 25 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 26 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 27 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | 2% |
| 28 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 29 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LING Eddie | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 31 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 33 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | HAN Derek | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 35 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% | 14% | 1% |
| 36 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 37 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 38 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 39 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 41 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 42 | ZHOU Leon | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 43 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 44 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% |
| 45 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 46 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 47 | WU Lucas | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 48 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 93% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | MA Bryant | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 51 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 53 | PARK Sangmin | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | TANG Albert | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 56 | BAYLDON william | 100% | 13% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | FINDLAY Zachary | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.