American Challenge RYC/RJCC Reg Opens 1/15

Cadet Men's Foil

Sunday, April 4, 2021 at 4:00 PM

King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DESERANNO Jeidus 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 59%
2 BURKE Spencer W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 21%
3 KASI Sanjay 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 29%
3 FOGELSON Frederick J. 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 30% 4%
5 CHEN Andrew 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 65% 22%
6 LI Richard 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 9%
7 FUKUDA Renzo K. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 21%
8 ZENG Lucas H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 36%
9 GRANT Lachlan K. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 25%
10 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 32%
11 ZHANG Andy W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 26%
12 YEROKHIN Michael N. 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 39% 8%
13 ZHANG Henry C. 100% 100% 99% 89% 55% 15%
14 COSTELLO Chaissen F. 100% 100% 95% 74% 37% 8%
15 LEE Jacob J 100% 93% 62% 21% 3% -
16 ZHAO Jason L. 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9%
17 WU Alexander 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9%
18 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 23%
19 SONG Leonardo T. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 41% 8%
20 HOBSON Aaron K. 100% 100% 97% 78% 39% 9% 1%
21 DEGREMONT Henri S. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 15%
22 CHENG Matthew S. 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 22% 3%
23 FU Samuel Y. 100% 100% 97% 75% 35% 7%
24 CHAN Tyler 100% 100% 97% 81% 43% 9%
25 LEE Aidan 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 9%
26 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 100% 100% 91% 53% 15% 2% -
27 KWON Ethan 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 8%
28 GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 26%
29 SCHENCK Koen M. 100% 100% 99% 85% 49% 12%
30 ZHAI Jeffrey 100% 100% 97% 72% 28% 5% -
31 BAE Kevin 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
32 GRAHAM Roy J. 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 11%
33 CHEN Allen 100% 100% 100% 93% 66% 23%
34 HUTH Mitchell 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 17%
35 LAURICELLA Douglas 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 18%
36 DAI Jonathan T. 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 24% 4%
37 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 22% 3%
38 HORSLEY Alexander 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 12%
39 REZNICK Nicholas J. 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 18% 2%
40 WANG Gerald Y. 100% 97% 80% 46% 14% 2% -
41 TANG Owen S. 100% 97% 66% 26% 5% -
42 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 100% 100% 96% 71% 30% 5%
43 FUKUDA Alessio R. 100% 100% 99% 95% 74% 34% 5%
44 AHN Jun 100% 100% 97% 76% 38% 10% 1%
45 DU Samuel R. 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 32% 6%
46 ACHILOV Sayid 100% 96% 74% 37% 9% 1% -
47 LI Ryan Z. 100% 96% 66% 26% 5% 1% -
48 FEDONCHIK Henry J. 100% 100% 98% 82% 42% 11% 1%
49 BROWN Alexander R. 100% 95% 69% 29% 6% 1% -
50 LE Vyn A. 100% 98% 85% 52% 18% 3% -
51 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 100% 91% 62% 27% 7% 1% -
52 HOWARD Michael 100% 97% 79% 44% 15% 3% -
53 KLOTZ Isaiah 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% - -
54 GUO Sean 100% 99% 89% 58% 22% 4% -
55 KITAGAWA Eric S. 100% 90% 59% 23% 4% - -
56 MAGIDSON Josh 100% 82% 29% 4% - - -
57 ZHOU Leon 100% 79% 40% 12% 2% - -
58 TALLARICO Matthew 100% 77% 26% 4% - - -
59 ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. 100% 92% 59% 20% 3% -
60 VAZQUEZ Zander 100% 100% 95% 70% 31% 7% 1%
61 TRAUGOT Owen G. 100% 94% 64% 26% 5% 1% -
62 XIAO EDWARD 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 22% 3%
62 LI Lianhao 100% 33% 5% - - - -
64 ORVANANOS Jorge 100% 99% 91% 68% 34% 9% 1%
65 BADLANI Dev 100% 81% 30% 5% - - -
66 ZHONG Guoren 100% 75% 31% 6% 1% - -
67 CHEN Kyle P. 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% - -
68 WANG Jackson 100% 95% 42% 9% 1% -
69 SONG Bryan 100% 90% 58% 22% 4% - -
70 PIESNER Zachary C. 100% 99% 85% 42% 10% 1% -
71 GUO Jacob 100% 86% 50% 17% 3% - -
72 BAEK David 100% 99% 87% 52% 17% 3% -
73 TRUBETSKI David 100% 88% 30% 4% - - -
74 REZA Farazi 100% 24% 2% - - -
75 SIMA Congyu Josh 100% 54% 13% 1% - -
76 VIVEROS Antonio 100% 13% - - - -
77 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 100% 73% 30% 6% 1% - -
78 POIROT Max 100% 41% 5% - - - -
78 LEVIN Daniel 100% 79% 34% 7% 1% - -
80 TOMLINSON Clayton 100% 53% 11% 1% - - -
81 KAN Edward 100% 24% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.