PTBA Basketball Association - La Puente, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 2 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 3 | GRAYSON Shane W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% |
| 3 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 5 | WANG owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 6 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 7 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 8% |
| 8 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 8% | |
| 9 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% | |
| 10 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | 3% |
| 11 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 12 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 14 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% | 1% |
| 16 | STCLAIR Jake | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | MA Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 18 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 41% | 5% |
| 19 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | TIEN Jabin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 22 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
| 24 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 13% | |
| 25 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | ZACHES Torrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 16% |
| 27 | LIU Dylan Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 28 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | FU Leon | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | MING Nathan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | DALVA Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | ANGADALA leela krishna | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | JU Hanul | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
| 36 | FITZGERALD Thomas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | LEE Jaden T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | JAMES Patrick | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | PEÑA Ethan | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SHA Michael | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 47 | GOMEZ Emmanuel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 48 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | MARDANI Aiden | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | COMER Alexander J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 50 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | LAU Christian | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | DIAZ Valentino | 100% | 92% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.