St Louis, MO - St Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 2 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 3 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% |
| 5 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 6 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 7 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
| 8 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 9 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
| 10 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% |
| 11 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
| 12 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 13 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 6% |
| 14 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
| 15 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 29% | 4% | |
| 17 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 3% |
| 18 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% |
| 19 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 20 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 14% | |
| 22 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 23 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 24 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 66% | 22% | 1% |
| 28 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 30 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 97% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | LO Preston | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 34 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 99% | 78% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | CHOE Jayden K. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HAN Derek | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 40 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 97% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | OH Jaden | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 45 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 48 | LAI Twayne | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | BOYKO Miles | 100% | 88% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | PARK Sangmin | 100% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHAO Bowen | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 13% | - | - | - | - | |
| 54 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | PARK STEPHEN | 100% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.