New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WEINKOPF William O. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 2 | MARX Oscar L. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
| 3 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 5 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 6 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 7 | CHENG Jonathan | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 8 | DU Samuel R. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 9 | LE Vyn A. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | WAN Jason | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 11 | NAGER Noah | - | - | 3% | 22% | 54% | 21% | |
| 12 | PELOSKY Zack B. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 13 | BING Charles | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 14 | BAE Kevin | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 15 | PARK Ryan | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 16 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
| 17 | MARSHALL Ian | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 18 | FU Samuel Y. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 19 | PYO Michael M. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
| 19 | ANTON Nathaniel | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 21 | PAE Jonathan L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 49% | 9% |
| 22 | ONIK Elijah T. | 1% | 9% | 38% | 42% | 9% | - | |
| 23 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 2% |
| 24 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 25 | ZHANG Evan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 26 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | BREIER Matthew F. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 28 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 45% | 10% | |
| 29 | LI Owen | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 30 | CHAN Tyler | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 31 | ORVANANOS Jorge | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% |
| 32 | ZHAO Jesse | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | HOWARD Michael | 9% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | WANG Gerald Y. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 35 | TSAI Max W. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 36 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | JIANG Owen | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 38 | GOOR Julian | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 39 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 40 | KWON Ethan | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 42 | PAE Brian L. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | QI Steve | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | JIN Dennis H. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 45 | YAN Edward Tianshuo | - | 8% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 46 | LI Eric | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 47 | SHIN Joshua J. | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 49 | MILLER Aidan A. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 50 | TALLARICO Matthew | 2% | 17% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | AHN Jun | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 52 | BAO Wenyuan | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | 4% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 54 | GUO Sean | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 55 | HANSEN William | 12% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | GAO Sean | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 58 | WU Alexander | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 59 | VALENTON Timothy | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | MORGESON Colin | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | VITKAUSKAS Justin G. | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 63 | HU Jason | 22% | 45% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | GAO Anthony | 3% | 21% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 66 | CHAN Justin D. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | WU Jerry | 1% | 10% | 39% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 68 | MENG Zhaoyi | 27% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 69 | PITERBARG Maxim | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 70 | BASAK Ashton R. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 71 | SKELLY Aidan K. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | PELT Ethan T. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 73 | BOYLE Aiden P. | 36% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | LIGOS Alex M. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 75 | GALBAN Matthias L. | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 76 | WANG Mason | 23% | 46% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 77 | PROMRAT Pete | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | LI Ayren | 26% | 46% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | GAO Michael | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 80 | DE JAGER Robert | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.