New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 2 | FELDMAN Jaemin | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | MACARTY Jordan T. | D V D D D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 3 | LEHR William D. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | LEE Noah | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | EKE Frank | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 9 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 10 | BEYRICH Henry J. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 11 | DYER Ian E. | D V V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 12 | FERREIRA Noah J. | V V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 13 | LIZOTTE Zachary M. | D D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | LANGTON Sawyer | V D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | LOMBARDO Matthew | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 16 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | D D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 17 | RICHARD Owen | V D V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | LONCAR Luka E. | D V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 19 | HA Daniel | V V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | STEVENS George | V D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 21 | SHAH Maximilian A. | V D V V V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | DIBENERDINI Aidan | V V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 23 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V V D D V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | GALIS Nicholas | V D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | KOBI Samuel | V D D V D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 26 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V D D D | D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 28 | CHOW Maxwell | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 29 | BHATIA Rahil | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 30 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | D D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | HURDAL Leif G. | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | FUSSMAN Yuval | D D D D D V | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 33 | KOKENGE Reid | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 34 | ROLLO Emmett H. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 35 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.