Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
2 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
3 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
3 | ZHENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
5 | HAMZA Tudor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% |
6 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
7 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
8 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
9 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
10 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
11 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
12 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
13 | GRAVES Lawson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 11% | |
14 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
15 | CARTY JR Johndale | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
16 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
17 | SOKOL Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
18 | BUI Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
19 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
20 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
21 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 44% |
22 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
23 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
24 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
25 | LAM Alan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
26 | SERAFYM Damian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
27 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
28 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
29 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 13% |
30 | CORBIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
31 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - |
32 | FENG shang | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
33 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 8% |
34 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
35 | YANG Gary | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
36 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% |
37 | LU Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
38 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 31% | 7% |
39 | MANGAN Hunter | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
40 | RUSSELL Michael | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
41 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
42 | KIM Teddy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
43 | FRANGER Max | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
44 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
45 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
46 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
47 | ZAHRAN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
48 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
49 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
50 | REAGAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
51 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
52 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
53 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
54 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
55 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
56 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
57 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
57 | CHEN Bowen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
59 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
60 | KUPPUSAMY Kotravel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
61 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
62 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 11% | |
63 | HEADRICK Jack | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
64 | YILMAZ Tarik | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
65 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
66 | JOHNSON Soren | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
68 | DODIN Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
69 | LIU Josh | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
70 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
71 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
72 | OSBORN Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
73 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
74 | DECKER Hunter | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
75 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
76 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
77 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
78 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
79 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
80 | TUSANTOSO McKenzie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
80 | AHN EZRA | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
82 | ELMARSAFI Nurideen | 100% | 86% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
83 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 91% | 63% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
84 | KUANG Bryan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
85 | MOORE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
86 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
87 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 99% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
88 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
89 | WU Nathan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
90 | SOLARZ Arthur | 100% | 76% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
91 | LI Ray | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
92 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
93 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
94 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
95 | KANG Brandon | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
96 | DOAN Christopher | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
97 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
98 | SHCHUR Grayson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
99 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
100 | MA Ryan | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
101 | JIANG Oscar | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
102 | TUMULA Arihaan | 100% | 81% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
103 | SHAFFER Tyler | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
104 | KIM Tae | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
104 | PARK Aiden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
106 | GUO Lucas | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
107 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
108 | STARKIE Kitteridge | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
109 | FU Adrian | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
110 | KLINKNER Richard | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
111 | DAI Chengwen | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
112 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
113 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
114 | KIM Henry | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
115 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
116 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
117 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
118 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
118 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
120 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
120 | HARGREAVES Ryan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
120 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
123 | WAGHOLIKAR Prathit | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
124 | KIM Remington | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
125 | KIM Julian | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
126 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
127 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
128 | CLARKSON Moby | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.