Ohio Expo Center - Kasich Hall - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
2 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
3 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 37% | |
3 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 32% | |
5 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
6 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 6% |
7 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
8 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 23% |
9 | BALL James T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
10 | BURBERRY Alan | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | < 1% | |
11 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
12 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 13% |
13 | LU Yikai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 47% | 7% |
14 | HO Jia Le Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
15 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
16 | KLOSTERMANN Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
17 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
18 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 47% | 6% |
19 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
20 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
21 | UPTON Craig | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
22 | SZEGO Bence P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
23 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | |
24 | DEDENBACH Joseph | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
25 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
26 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
27 | WANG Winston | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - |
28 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
29 | LIU Jacob B. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | |
30 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
31 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
32 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
33 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
34 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
35 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% | |
36 | MCCORD Clark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
37 | MARTIN William | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
38 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
39 | PARK Sky | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - |
40 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
41 | LAI Twayne | 100% | 92% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
42 | PALWAI Suhas | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
43 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
44 | VALENTINO Paul | 100% | 94% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
45 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
45 | KHAN Adnan | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
47 | SONG Austin | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
48 | STRINGER David | 100% | 88% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
49 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
50 | ZHEREBTCOV Kirill | 100% | 97% | 74% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
51 | ZHAO Bowen | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
52 | RAJPAL Alastair | 100% | 80% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
53 | BIESIADA Jan | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
54 | PALFI Jakob | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
55 | FU Steven | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | WEATHERINGTON Jude A. | 100% | 79% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
57 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
59 | ALLIE Dominic | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
60 | CARTER Michael | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.