Strength Ranking

Men's Epee, Birth Year 2013

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate* Cons. Est.* 		180-day
Trend		 Rating
1 Luo, Alexander 2070 1783 201 A26
2 Du, Evan 1999 1718 115 B26
3 Kropp, Wesley 1875 1604 19 B26
4 Zhai, Derrick 1879 1561 3 A26
5 Tang, Daniel 1727 1465 232 C26
6 Tubaltsev, Evan 1695 1435 - D25
7 MA, GEORGE 2153 1427 - U
8 Liu, Austin 1677 1419 171 C26
9 zhang, jonathan 1667 1405 12 B25
10 Mosley, Wally 1650 1391 148 B25
11 Chen, Evan 1645 1391 128 C26
12 Armstrong, Payson 1603 1352 260 B26
13 Chen, Aiden 1574 1319 194 C26
14 Zhang, Chaoyi（Joey） 1571 1316 125 C26
15 Kuang, Cyrus 1629 1315 - U
16 Lucas, Maddox 2810 1315 1315 U
17 Hwang, Matthew 1568 1308 144 C26
18 Yao, Ryan 1562 1307 31 D26
19 Beletskii, Ivan 1647 1307 83 U
20 Maskin, Mikhail 1529 1271 185 C26
21 Wu, Nathan 1529 1266 1 D26
22 Puthoff, Henry 1512 1264 69 U
23 Karyuchenko, Yehor 2363 1244 271 E26
24 Chiang, William 1493 1235 21 D26
25 Wu, MiEr 1465 1212 15 D26
26 Aubert Besses, Olivier 1953 1208 219 U
27 LU, TONGYAO 1830 1200 - U
28 Lee, Leo 1424 1171 51 C26
29 Khushraj, Rohan 1428 1166 69 D26
30 Nool, Aaron 1415 1164 201 D25
31 wang, jinghang 2698 1150 - U
32 LIN, Jun 2353 1149 - U
33 Fernandez, William 1419 1144 42 U
34 Pegus, Izzy 1511 1139 1139 E26
35 Rau, Shogun 1404 1138 70 U
36 Roberts, Arthur 1382 1128 61 E26
37 Tang, Luke 1376 1125 125 C26
38 Ding, Max 1375 1121 58 D25
39 Lu, Ian 1359 1107 98 D26
40 Yao, Aiden 1359 1106 9 C25
41 Chen, Daniel 1351 1102 140 E26
42 Garikipati, Tharan 1353 1100 49 U
43 Kuykendall, Logan 1343 1089 441 C26
44 Jin, Noah 1343 1089 562 E26
45 Madrigal Salvat, Guillermo 1339 1088 49 D25
46 Li, Andy 1338 1079 174 U
47 Rodriguez, Emiliano 1325 1072 187 U
48 Cox, Benjamin 2640 1071 - U
49 Zheng, Jasper 1313 1061 87 D26
50 Chen, Hayden 1313 1060 311 C26
51 Galbraith, Carson 1318 1055 42 U
52 Lee, James K. 1352 1053 87 U
53 Lin, Bryan 1291 1044 89 D26
54 Samoylov, Daniel 1288 1026 256 U
55 Hua, Nolan 1256 1004 101 E26
56 Zhukov, Egor 1256 1000 222 E25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.