Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2005

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Chen, Andrew 3535 3275 15 A25
2 Chen, Allen 3469 3200 - A25
3 Kim, Nicholas 3434 3170 8 A24
4 Um, Ethan 3398 3135 - A24
5 Zhang, Andy 3329 3069 39 A23
6 Burke, Spencer 3288 3017 3 A24
7 Wong, Adam 3175 2916 16 A21
8 Singh, Dayaal 3155 2895 70 A22
9 Onik, Elijah 3143 2885 25 A25
10 Kwon, Ethan 3149 2885 - A22
11 Huth, Mitchell 3124 2858 57 A25
12 Fukuda, Alessio 3108 2857 - A23
13 Hooshi, Dylan 3108 2847 - A21
14 Joseph, Dominic (Dom) 3076 2823 99 A22
15 Song, Leonardo 3055 2799 - A22
16 Muruhin, Yaroslav 3006 2750 16 B25
17 Wu, Nicholas 2976 2722 6 A23
18 Dierks, Kian 2971 2713 10 A23
19 Li, Raphael 2956 2697 - A24
20 Vazquez, Zander 2946 2691 31 A22
21 Costello, Chaissen 2955 2688 20 A25
22 Fogelson, Frederick 2931 2677 93 A23
23 Nager, Noah 2927 2674 - A22
24 Bae, Kevin 2925 2670 34 A23
25 Oh, Jonathan 2909 2651 - C21
26 DeGroot, Blake 2868 2614 - A23
27 Iyoki, Kent 3091 2613 - D22
28 Freedman, Samuel 2863 2611 6 A21
29 SICHITIU, Alexander 2870 2606 - A22
30 Lindner, Ruben 3135 2582 - A22
31 Sung, Chang-Han 2780 2524 - B22
32 Bagdány, Albert 3418 2508 - A24
33 Nunnink, Phillip 2720 2454 - A24
34 Chen, Boris 2861 2430 - B22
35 jittan, daniel 2684 2409 5 A24
36 Gatza, Logan 2644 2395 5 C25
37 Vargas, Bryan 2676 2354 - A24
38 Hobson, Aaron 2607 2353 - B23
39 Fortune, Alexander 2613 2352 4 B23
40 Berk, Theodore 2563 2306 - B23
41 Miller, Aidan 2537 2274 - B24
42 Lovin, Vlad 2517 2260 - B23
43 Chi, Alexander 2523 2252 - C22
44 Williams, Connor 2474 2222 10 B23
45 Oroszlan, Daniel 2586 2215 - B25
46 Bálint, Álmos 2997 2180 - A24
47 SHEN, Zhanyu 3562 2167 - E24
48 Finley, Dylan 2401 2149 60 C24
49 Emenheiser, Conrad 2400 2139 57 C25
50 Davidson, Elliot 2364 2108 116 C25
51 Seal, Maximus 2358 2103 - B24
52 Mo, Jason 2351 2087 - C25
53 Anderson, Jacob 2312 2058 - C24
54 WU, DING-JUN 2347 2038 5 B25
55 Ligos, Alex 2277 2025 74 B25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.