Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Men's FoilBirth Year 2005

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Chen, Andrew 3564 3292 - A25
2 Chen, Allen 3471 3199 - A25
3 Um, Ethan 3398 3135 - A24
4 Kim, Nicholas 3389 3125 36 A24
5 Zhang, Andy 3329 3069 - A23
6 Burke, Spencer 3288 3022 16 A24
7 Wong, Adam 3172 2908 24 B26
8 Singh, Dayaal 3143 2884 11 B26
9 Fukuda, Alessio 3108 2857 - A23
10 Onik, Elijah 3103 2848 14 A25
11 Joseph, Dominic 3076 2821 - A22
12 Bagdány, Albert 3423 2813 - A24
13 Huth, Mitchell 3058 2796 31 A25
14 Muruhin, Yaroslav 3046 2791 40 A25
15 Wu, Nicholas 2970 2716 - A23
16 Dierks, Kian 2946 2690 - A23
17 Costello, Chaissen 2953 2687 27 A25
18 Vazquez, Zander 2940 2684 7 B26
19 Fogelson, Frederick 2931 2678 - A23
20 Oh, Jonathan 2909 2651 - D25
21 DeGroot, Blake 2868 2614 - A23
22 Iyoki, Kent 3091 2613 - E26
23 Bae, Kevin 2860 2605 - A23
24 Freedman, Samuel 2862 2604 8 B25
25 Lindner, Ruben 3135 2582 - A22
26 SICHITIU, Alexander 2837 2567 36 B26
27 Horsley, Alexander 2809 2540 31 C25
28 Nunnink, Phillip 2754 2489 34 A26
29 Chen, Boris 2862 2430 - C26
30 jittan, daniel 2694 2410 1 A24
31 Gatza, Logan 2644 2395 - C25
32 Vargas, Bryan 2676 2355 - A24
33 Hobson, Aaron 2607 2353 - B23
34 Fortune, Alexander 2612 2348 - B23
35 Berk, Theodore 2563 2307 - B23
36 Kim, Derek 2533 2279 - C23
37 Williams, Connor 2475 2222 - B23
38 Oroszlan, Daniel 2545 2212 20 B26
39 Emenheiser, Conrad 2421 2158 2 A26
40 Davidson, Elliot 2364 2108 - C25
41 Mo, Jason 2368 2095 - C26
42 Finley, Dylan 2349 2095 - C24
43 Seal, Maximus 2341 2086 - B26
44 WU, DING-JUN 2374 2084 9 B26
45 Anderson, Jacob 2313 2059 - C24
46 PAN, Qiwen 2588 2050 27 B25
47 Ligos, Alex 2290 2037 11 B25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.