Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Men's FoilBirth Year 2005

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Chen, Andrew 3564 3292 - A25
2 Chen, Allen 3471 3199 - A25
3 Um, Ethan 3398 3135 - A24
4 Kim, Nicholas 3389 3125 45 A24
5 Zhang, Andy 3329 3069 - A23
6 Burke, Spencer 3253 2986 31 A24
7 Wong, Adam 3194 2932 - A21
8 Singh, Dayaal 3143 2884 11 A22
9 Onik, Elijah 3125 2867 18 A25
10 Fukuda, Alessio 3108 2857 - A23
11 Joseph, Dominic 3076 2821 - A22
12 Huth, Mitchell 3079 2815 41 A25
13 Bagdány, Albert 3423 2813 125 A24
14 Muruhin, Yaroslav 3046 2791 40 A25
15 Wu, Nicholas 2970 2716 - A23
16 Vazquez, Zander 2946 2691 - A22
17 Dierks, Kian 2946 2690 24 A23
18 Fogelson, Frederick 2931 2678 - A23
19 Costello, Chaissen 2926 2660 28 A25
20 Oh, Jonathan 2909 2651 - D25
21 DeGroot, Blake 2868 2614 - A23
22 Iyoki, Kent 3091 2613 - D22
23 Bae, Kevin 2860 2605 47 A23
24 SICHITIU, Alexander 2873 2602 4 A22
25 Freedman, Samuel 2850 2596 1 B25
26 Lindner, Ruben 3135 2582 - A22
27 Horsley, Alexander 2839 2571 - C25
28 Nunnink, Phillip 2720 2455 - A24
29 Chen, Boris 2862 2430 - B22
30 jittan, daniel 2694 2410 1 A24
31 Gatza, Logan 2644 2395 - C25
32 Vargas, Bryan 2676 2355 - A24
33 Hobson, Aaron 2607 2353 - B23
34 Fortune, Alexander 2612 2348 - B23
35 Berk, Theodore 2563 2307 - B23
36 Kim, Derek 2533 2279 - C23
37 Oroszlan, Daniel 2575 2232 39 B25
38 Williams, Connor 2475 2222 - B23
39 Emenheiser, Conrad 2419 2156 8 A26
40 Davidson, Elliot 2364 2108 - C25
41 Mo, Jason 2368 2095 8 C26
42 Finley, Dylan 2349 2095 32 C24
43 WU, DING-JUN 2391 2093 29 B25
44 Seal, Maximus 2341 2086 17 B26
45 Anderson, Jacob 2313 2059 - C24
46 Ligos, Alex 2308 2055 29 B25
47 PAN, Qiwen 2588 2050 - B25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.