| Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louie, Bryce | 3829 | 3532 | 86 | A25 |
| 2 | Borowiak, Arwen | 3726 | 3312 | 46 | B23 |
| 3 | Paik, Hyun | 3521 | 3218 | - | B23 |
| 4 | Ndiaye, Edriss | 3478 | 3211 | 69 | A25 |
| 5 | Song, Lawrence | 3486 | 3210 | - | A22 |
| 6 | Poon, Simon | 3514 | 3115 | 5 | B25 |
| 7 | Shafaie, Kaveh | 3344 | 3075 | - | A23 |
| 8 | Sohn, Christopher | 3339 | 3024 | 5 | C23 |
| 9 | Yang, Adam | 3244 | 2988 | 31 | A20 |
| 10 | Wong, Wesley | 3219 | 2921 | - | B23 |
| 11 | Korablin, Anton | 3206 | 2912 | 2 | B22 |
| 12 | Hu, Oliver | 3154 | 2900 | 11 | A19 |
| 13 | DiVito, Dylan | 3157 | 2897 | - | A22 |
| 14 | Totusek, Marek | 3286 | 2860 | - | A22 |
| 15 | Maurer, Ned | 3083 | 2824 | - | B24 |
| 16 | Huth, Jacob | 3026 | 2774 | 16 | A25 |
| 17 | Sezer, Kaya | 3044 | 2767 | 37 | A22 |
| 18 | Euscher, Alex | 3045 | 2728 | - | C24 |
| 19 | Magidson, Gabriel | 2953 | 2698 | - | A22 |
| 20 | Yang, Andy | 2876 | 2609 | 161 | B25 |
| 21 | Espinoza, Joaquin | 2991 | 2593 | - | B21 |
| 22 | Westphal, David | 2872 | 2589 | - | C24 |
| 23 | Montalvo-Zotter, Gabriel | 2863 | 2589 | - | C22 |
| 24 | Craley, Thomas | 2828 | 2565 | 88 | C24 |
| 25 | Novachenko, Nestor | 2861 | 2564 | - | C22 |
| 26 | Curley, Sebastian | 2842 | 2564 | - | C23 |
| 27 | Gu, Jeffrey | 2829 | 2561 | 2 | C23 |
| 28 | Arnold, Oscar | 2817 | 2501 | - | D23 |
| 29 | Toro, Alejandro | 2804 | 2492 | 114 | B22 |
| 30 | Peters, Nathan | 2732 | 2455 | 11 | C24 |
| 31 | Goguen-Compagnoni, Nicholas | 2716 | 2449 | 79 | B22 |
| 32 | Hu, Robin | 2677 | 2420 | - | B22 |
| 33 | Galemore, Jonathan | 2688 | 2349 | - | C24 |
| 34 | Whitehead, Amir | 2616 | 2342 | 9 | C24 |
| 35 | Shaji, Karthik | 2630 | 2339 | 41 | C25 |
| 36 | Quinones, Diego | 2556 | 2296 | 60 | B24 |
| 37 | Bryant, Max | 2614 | 2288 | - | E25 |
| 38 | Wilkens, Zach | 2838 | 2224 | 124 | D25 |
| 39 | Luna, Emilio | 2384 | 2109 | - | E23 |
| 40 | Sinha, Verdhaan | 2323 | 2043 | 25 | C25 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.