Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Men's FoilBirth Year 2004

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Emmer, Chase 3787 3486 28 A26
2 Nagimov, Marsel 3674 3390 - A25
3 Kumbla, Samarth 3516 3242 95 A26
4 Chen, Ziyuan 3451 3185 50 A26
5 Zhang, Daniel 3373 3110 24 A25
6 Xiao, Enoch 3375 3103 - A24
7 Kasi, Sanjay 3354 3091 8 A22
8 GRIFFITH, JACK 3335 3068 60 A25
9 Kim, Brandon 3231 2971 - A22
10 Yu, Vinni 3225 2970 88 A24
11 Xiao, Ethan 3181 2914 - A23
12 Li, Wangjie 3233 2901 91 A24
13 Levy, Jacob 3151 2887 3 A25
14 Schenck, Koen 3135 2876 - A22
15 Mion, Lorenzo 3132 2859 23 A23
16 Mitchell, Philip 3121 2849 - A22
17 Tsang, Matthew 3121 2847 - C25
18 Stanley, Mason 3097 2835 11 A26
19 Vasiliev, Sacha 3145 2819 - B25
20 Lao, Scott 3045 2786 95 A24
21 XIAO, EDWARD 3016 2748 3 A26
22 Choun, Samuel Minwook 3003 2736 - B23
23 Zhao, Jason 2937 2686 7 A22
24 Klostermann, Max 2970 2686 - A22
25 Zeng, Lucas 2929 2675 86 A22
26 Isolani, Gregorio 3067 2661 14 A25
27 Lauricella, Douglas 2884 2632 - B22
28 Hergan, Luca 2920 2586 - C23
29 Lee, Chris 2830 2573 - B23
30 Belluomo, David 2817 2560 - A23
31 Zeljkovic, Dusan 2896 2510 - C23
32 Chan, Tyler 2775 2508 8 C23
33 Reznick, Nicholas 2743 2482 - B23
34 Kim, Siwoo 3482 2473 - C25
35 Lai, Christopher 2691 2409 12 B26
36 Oakland, Brennan 2649 2365 - D23
37 Robinson, Keegan 2595 2320 129 C26
38 Newell, Ian 2566 2307 - C24
39 Leung, Ethan 2564 2250 - A25
40 Van Buren, Brett 2514 2242 3 C23
41 Gatrell, Mitchell 2472 2214 29 A25
42 Goldade, Luke 2466 2209 - C25
43 Kitagawa, Eric 2449 2193 - B24
44 Choi, Dongyun 3334 2182 - A22
45 Cai, Jinhui 2946 2140 80 U
46 Klein, Sebastian 2392 2131 - C26
47 Gallucci, Charles John 2375 2124 - E23
48 Brislawn, Reilly 2530 2049 10 C25
49 Wilkins, Mateo 2297 2030 34 C26

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.