Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2007

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Li, Richard 3314 3034 51 A25
2 Lee, Jacob J 3280 3004 61 A26
3 Rusadze, Nickolas 3241 2969 39 A26
4 Wu, Alexander 3216 2937 141 A24
5 Lo, Conrad 3203 2930 37 A25
6 Graham, Roy 3191 2915 19 A26
7 Cullivan, Justice 3192 2911 47 A25
8 Goor, Julian 3159 2894 21 A25
9 Tolba, Abdelrahman 3138 2839 12 A25
10 Lyu, Weiqiao Victor 3081 2807 - A25
11 Lee, Aidan 3057 2790 39 A24
12 Sadovsky, Leor 3038 2771 4 A24
13 Woo, Christian 3031 2766 39 A25
14 Dai, Jonathan 3012 2746 92 A24
15 Rose, Ben 2997 2737 47 A26
16 Lewis, Akhil 2970 2710 50 A25
17 Kim, Ryan 2915 2655 39 A24
18 Zhai, Jeffrey 2886 2635 21 A25
19 Wyman, Julian 2893 2634 1 A25
20 Elwood, Sebastian 2857 2598 5 A24
21 Po, Oliver 2841 2583 - A24
22 Jain, Aditya 2817 2565 19 A24
23 Jiang, Owen 2797 2544 28 A25
24 Miall, Steven 2726 2470 13 A24
25 Radoslavov, Ivan-Asen 2713 2461 11 A24
26 Park, Jason 2710 2448 - B25
27 Klotz, Isaiah 2698 2441 5 A25
28 Valouev, Aleksey 2691 2435 - B23
29 Lee, Juyoung 3239 2428 2428 A25
30 Han, Changhee 2667 2415 21 A23
31 CHALUT, Etienne 2709 2396 87 A26
32 Vaaben, Frode 2939 2377 390 B24
33 Orr, Spencer 2591 2336 - B24
34 Kryltsov, Michael 2576 2312 27 A25
35 Gong, Benjamin 2527 2278 - A24
36 MEJIA, MATTHEW 2521 2263 - B25
37 Wujastyk, Leon 2512 2259 18 B25
38 Reeves, Liam 2502 2244 - A23
39 Tsao, Lukas 2503 2244 2 A23
40 Kim, Andrew 2493 2231 - B22
41 Martin, Elmer 2486 2225 1 B23
42 Shagidanyan, German 2467 2210 34 B24
43 Park, Sky 2411 2160 89 B26
44 LI, Matthew 2405 2152 - B25
45 Tikhaev, Alexander 2404 2147 103 B25
46 Lippman, Sam 2402 2143 7 B25
47 McIsaac, Finn 2399 2137 34 A25
48 Cho, Beomjun 2935 2129 2129 A25
49 Song, Austin 2370 2116 - B24
50 Andric, Borna 2318 2061 41 B25
51 Goh, Jonas 2458 2054 31 A26
52 Miller, Jordan 2294 2035 3 B25
53 Gao, Payton 2283 2031 - C24
54 Zhou, Leon 2285 2023 - D23

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.