Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2007

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Li, Richard 3314 3034 51 A25
2 Lee, Jacob J 3280 3004 18 A26
3 Rusadze, Nickolas 3241 2969 36 A26
4 Wu, Alexander 3216 2937 88 A24
5 Lo, Conrad 3203 2930 40 A25
6 Graham, Roy 3191 2915 35 A26
7 Cullivan, Justice 3192 2911 65 A25
8 Goor, Julian 3159 2894 21 A25
9 Tolba, Abdelrahman 3138 2839 - A25
10 Lyu, Weiqiao Victor 3081 2807 - A25
11 Lee, Aidan 3057 2790 35 A24
12 Sadovsky, Leor 3038 2771 - A24
13 Woo, Christian 3031 2766 1 A25
14 Dai, Jonathan 3012 2746 72 A24
15 Rose, Ben 2997 2737 16 A26
16 Lewis, Akhil 2970 2710 41 A25
17 Kim, Ryan 2915 2655 17 A24
18 Zhai, Jeffrey 2886 2635 21 A25
19 Wyman, Julian 2893 2634 29 A25
20 Elwood, Sebastian 2857 2598 - A24
21 Po, Oliver 2841 2583 - A24
22 Jain, Aditya 2817 2565 77 A24
23 Jiang, Owen 2797 2544 - A25
24 Miall, Steven 2726 2470 13 A24
25 Radoslavov, Ivan-Asen 2713 2461 7 A24
26 Park, Jason 2710 2448 - B25
27 Klotz, Isaiah 2698 2441 13 A25
28 Valouev, Aleksey 2691 2435 - B23
29 Lee, Juyoung 3239 2428 - A25
30 Han, Changhee 2667 2415 3 A23
31 CHALUT, Etienne 2709 2396 14 A26
32 Vaaben, Frode 2939 2377 390 B24
33 Augustine, Aaron 2592 2336 - B24
34 Orr, Spencer 2591 2336 - B24
35 Kryltsov, Michael 2576 2312 2 A25
36 Gong, Benjamin 2527 2278 - A24
37 MEJIA, MATTHEW 2521 2263 - B25
38 Wujastyk, Leon 2512 2259 6 B25
39 Reeves, Liam 2502 2244 - A23
40 Tsao, Lukas 2503 2244 7 A23
41 Shagidanyan, German 2492 2233 31 B24
42 Kim, Andrew 2493 2231 - B22
43 Martin, Elmer 2486 2225 1 B23
44 Lippman, Sam 2425 2164 51 B26
45 Park, Sky 2411 2160 144 B26
46 LI, Matthew 2405 2152 - B25
47 McIsaac, Finn 2399 2137 38 A25
48 Tikhaev, Alexander 2385 2129 104 B25
49 Cho, Beomjun 2935 2129 - A25
50 Song, Austin 2370 2116 - B24
51 Goh, Jonas 2458 2054 30 A26
52 Andric, Borna 2300 2043 34 B25
53 Miller, Jordan 2294 2035 3 B25
54 Gao, Payton 2283 2031 - C24
55 Zhou, Leon 2285 2023 - D23

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.