Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2007

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Li, Richard 3314 3034 51 A25
2 Lee, Jacob J 3280 3004 18 A26
3 Rusadze, Nickolas 3242 2969 36 A26
4 Wu, Alexander 3217 2937 88 A24
5 Lo, Conrad 3203 2930 40 A25
6 Graham, Roy 3191 2915 35 A26
7 Cullivan, Justice 3192 2911 65 A25
8 Goor, Julian 3159 2894 21 A25
9 Tolba, Abdelrahman 3138 2839 - A25
10 Lyu, Weiqiao Victor 3081 2807 - A25
11 Lee, Aidan 3057 2790 35 A24
12 Sadovsky, Leor 3038 2772 - A24
13 Woo, Christian 3031 2766 1 A25
14 Dai, Jonathan 3012 2746 72 A24
15 Rose, Ben 2997 2737 16 A26
16 Lewis, Akhil 2970 2711 41 A25
17 Kim, Ryan 2915 2655 16 A24
18 Zhai, Jeffrey 2886 2635 21 A25
19 Wyman, Julian 2893 2635 30 A25
20 Elwood, Sebastian 2857 2598 - A24
21 Po, Oliver 2841 2583 - A24
22 Jain, Aditya 2817 2565 77 A24
23 Jiang, Owen 2797 2544 - A25
24 Miall, Steven 2726 2470 13 A24
25 Radoslavov, Ivan-Asen 2714 2462 8 A24
26 Park, Jason 2710 2448 - B25
27 Klotz, Isaiah 2698 2441 14 A25
28 Valouev, Aleksey 2691 2435 - B23
29 Lee, Juyoung 3239 2428 - A25
30 Han, Changhee 2667 2415 3 A23
31 CHALUT, Etienne 2709 2396 14 A26
32 Vaaben, Frode 2939 2377 389 B24
33 Augustine, Aaron 2592 2336 - B24
34 Orr, Spencer 2591 2336 - B24
35 Kryltsov, Michael 2576 2313 2 A25
36 Gong, Benjamin 2527 2278 - A24
37 MEJIA, MATTHEW 2522 2263 - B25
38 Wujastyk, Leon 2512 2259 6 B25
39 Tsao, Lukas 2504 2245 6 A23
40 Reeves, Liam 2502 2244 - A23
41 Shagidanyan, German 2492 2233 31 B24
42 Kim, Andrew 2493 2231 - B22
43 Martin, Elmer 2487 2225 1 B23
44 Lippman, Sam 2425 2165 52 B26
45 Park, Sky 2412 2160 145 B26
46 LI, Matthew 2406 2153 - B25
47 McIsaac, Finn 2399 2137 42 A25
48 Tikhaev, Alexander 2386 2129 104 B25
49 Cho, Beomjun 2935 2129 - A25
50 Song, Austin 2370 2116 - B24
51 Goh, Jonas 2458 2054 30 A26
52 Andric, Borna 2301 2043 34 B25
53 Gao, Payton 2283 2031 - C24
54 Zhou, Leon 2285 2023 - D23
55 Miller, Jordan 2266 2008 31 B25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.